Amazing video by Technology Connections. It’s a long one, but don’t miss his 30 minute angry rant at the end.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have been watching his videos for years with great enthusiasm.

    If I ever meat him, it won’t be a handshake. That rant at the end deserves a hug. I love that antifascist energy that came pouring off him.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I know it’s not the main point of his video, but I really wish he’d looked into the CapEx vs OpEx stuff a bit more.

    For example, when talking about how much fuel his car uses in its lifetime vs. the cost of buying solar panels, he makes it clear that the solar panels are a better investment than buying gasoline. But, what he doesn’t talk about is the difficulty for a lot of people in coming up with the money up-front to make that investment. Especially if you’re poor, finding $25 per week to put gas in your car is easier than spending $3000 up front to put solar panels on your house. I know later he makes the argument that it might not even make sense to put solar panels on your house. But, that up front cost is also there for buying an electric vehicle vs. buying a car with an ICE (fuck ICE). The Nissan Cube he showed had a starting price of $18k when it was last available new in 2014. The Ioniq 5 starts at double that, at more than $36k. As far as I can tell, you can’t get a new electric car for less than $30k, whereas the cheapest gas cars are only $23k or so.

    A big reason for the status quo is that paying small amounts constantly is possible when you’re poor, but paying a big up front cost to go electric isn’t. What’s worse (and goes with the last half hour of his video), is that we’re in this situation because the fossil fuel companies keep getting subsidies, whereas any subsidies for electric cars or photovoltaic panels keeps getting shut down.

    Also, I know it’s an American channel so it has to use things like “gallons”, but please when talking about energy, use Joules, not “kilowatt hours”.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      My partner does Energy research and Kilowatt hours is a very common unit of measurement she has to deal with. Its not even non-standard. It uses S.I. units, even if I find it odd. Has nothing to do with U.S. customary units Americans use.

    • Also, I know it’s an American channel so it has to use things like “gallons”, but please when talking about energy, use Joules, not “kilowatt hours”.

      Does Europe use joules to measure electricity usage in your home? 🤔

  • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Just when I thought I couldn’t like him more, he goes and drops this gigabased rant.

    TC for U.S president honestly

  • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Fell asleep an hour into his last night, didn’t expect it to be that long, but I am looking forward to finishing it.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    17 hours ago

    That rant at the end really sums up my feelings as a Midwestern leftist. Hell the whole thing does honestly. But you treat people right, you make prudent decisions, and you treat labor with dignity and respect.

    I also really respect him for accepting when something that had been obvious to him (the value proposition of solar and electrification) turned out to have not been obvious to others so he cut the snark and explained his reasoning. It’s an admirable display of character. But also, yeah it had been obvious to me as well.

    Probably not my favorite video of his, but definitely rhe one I respect the most

    • Smushem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      If you haven’t already, try out the LibRedirect extension for your browser. It takes a small amount of configuring, but it is able to redirect you to privacy oriented front ends for most social media platforms including youtube. Once set up, it can automatically take you to an invidious instance whenever you click a youtube link.

      Also, you can go to inv.nadeko.net (which is my go-to) from your browser and search all of youtube through it. Same thing as using LibRedirect, it’s just the manual version.

      If you’re on android you can use the NewPipe app. Similar idea as Invidious, it’s just a self contained app and not a website.

      • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        It’s a lot of maintenance. I’m not knocking it, I’m just pointing out how difficult it is.

        I hosted a pixelfed server for my city and it cost a few hundred bucks out of my own pocket. It was a test run so I can push my city to move their social media to open-source.

        But the constant need to apply spam protection and abuse from visitors, not to mention abuse from users like copyright shit and even CSAM. My expensive side project became a full time job.

          • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            My theory is that it’s just a handful of people who are using anything free to mirror that content, out of fear of losing it.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I imagine some of them are also just trolls trying to get people in trouble. (Pedophillic trolls, to be clear.) The same way folks just wanna break stuff just to break it. But who fucking knows. Some people are just disgusting and ruin good things.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve been connected to renewables for over a year now and am quite satisfied with its performance, although I could be much happier if there were less trees lining the line paths causing outages during winters. That being said, when it does go out the line managers are very quick to fix it.

  • Baggie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Sometimes I’ve been feeling like I’m the weird one for caring about other people and the shit that’s been going on. It’s really nice to see someone as angry as I am.

      • October1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I actually stopped watching it at the hour mark because I had to make dinner but then I let it play while I worked and holy shit! This dude for president!

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          This dude for president!

          Can you imagine what he could do? I mean, if he could focus on the President thing and not use his time in office to take apart washing machines and heat pumps.

          • rmuk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Technology Connections video in 2020: “This is a Sunbeam Radiant toaster”

            Technology Connections video in 2034: “This is an AGM-158C long-range anti-ship missile”

    • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Did they break him…? Or did they set him free? :D

      (was going to go with “unleashed” but that carries a different vibe not fitting to this serious cause :) )

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 day ago

    Great video. Completely breaks down the argument. You already knew this of you had been paying attention. Oil/gas for electricity generation in any form is DOA. It is insanely more expensive than solar + battery.

    Not to mention destructive to the environment and politically fraught with issues.

    To think if our government went all in it could provide dirt cheap limitless energy that would not cause lung disease or wars is staggering.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        But what about the coal miners? 🥺 More importantly the coal mine owners, won’t somebody please think of them? 🥺

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          it’s the same story as weed legalization, it only happens after the current established powers have given themselves enough time to secure the new playing field.

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Wondering now if paradoxically accelerating global warming increases stock ROI in renewables as the perceived value of renewable energy increases with the perceived/predicted level of global warming.

            • untorquer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              It’s capitalism, power is wealth by definition. These are compatible concepts.

              By perceived value i mean speculation.

              • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 hours ago

                You have less power but more wealth than a Mycenean king. You have a more steady diet that is healthier for you, with better healthcare, better housing, more time for leisure, less chance of being robbed or murdered or killed in battle, etc. etc. But the king could have people killed or tortured; he could send people to their deaths; pass judgment in any moral dispute between hundreds of his subjects; etc.

                The capitalist elite gladly loses wealth to gain power. And the power a rich person has over someone who must work for them to eat is incomprehensibly greater than the power a rich person has over someone who can eat regardless of whether they work for them. Thanks to ICE and other anti-immigration laws, rich people can effectively keep undocumented migrants as slaves again. What are they going to do? Complain and get themselves sent to a concentration camp?

                What do you think a billionaire would rather have? A hundred mansions, ten private jets, twenty yachts, and a thousand unionized employees; or ten mansions, one private jet, two yachts, and a hundred slaves?

                Wealth truly is not equivalent to power.

                • untorquer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  I agree that wealth is not equivalent to power but I continue to assert that it is the fundamental concept of capitalism. It’s rule by those who can exploit a market most effectively amassing the greatest amount of capital (by money/property value).

                  I find wealth in having hobbies and relationships that don’t return monetarily on my energy investment. This is incompatible with capitalism. While living under capitalism, i could have the highest quantity of relationships of the highest quality with other humans and it would still be worthless compared to someone with more capacity than me for taking on debt.

                  I wonder if I’m being misinterpreted here so if it’s unclear at this point; i see capitalism as a direct assault on our very humanity and a psychological disease that tears from us our empathy and feeling for one another through the pursuit of “wealth”. I despise it.

              • mirshafie@europe.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                16 hours ago

                They use the aesthetics of capitalism to intellectualize and explain why we should not question their supremacy.

                In reality, capitalism does not in any way justify monopolization of natural resources, or the large-scale destruction of the environment.

                Capitalism is the ideology of thr petit-bourgeoisie, not the actual bourgeoisie. They are just social-darwinists.

                • untorquer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 hours ago

                  I do not understand what this adds to the concept of capitalism other than introducing the term “social darwinism”.

                  There is no difference between “the aesthetics” of capitalism and its actualization, and neither base a capitalist’s actions in regard to benefitting society beyond “the market”. Capitalism is simply the current method of accruing power for someone to push their personal ideology on others. It just happens that the most effective method to exploit capitalism is to reject any sense of empathy or consideration for anything external or internal, especially flesh and blood humans because they are the only real threat to your power.

            • untorquer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Mmm… Well i think there are enough of them that think long term to maintain their institutions. The oil industry has been suppressing concerns about climate change and disaster for well over a century now

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    As someone not from the US, I can’t say how much I appreciate the last part of his video. As much as I understand why YouTubers want to “keep politics out of entertainment”, it’s disappointing and makes me lose interest in some US content because it seems like they are ignoring what’s going on around them.

    And about the batteries, that’s unfortunately an argument I sometimes hear from skeptics. “What are we going to do with all those batteries?” they ask. I explain that they can mostly be recycled and like to ask what are we going to do with all the CO2 in the air, but apparently it’s different. Ironically one of those persons is my father, that has a cabin with a solar system that I installed for him. He originally bought a generator but since it’s very noisy to run only for some lights, he prefers using the battery bank powered by a few solar panels on the roof. I’d show him this video but he doesn’t speak English and it’s probably a lost cause anyway.

    We can only hope that at least a few people can be influenced by this video; both parts.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The political discussion taboo only serves 2 purposes. 1, keep the stupid comfortable. To them, politics isn’t about ideas but about identity and is treated like a religion. You aren’t challenging an idea, you are threatening their identity. 2, Don’t upset rich people. Everyone discussion politics openly is a threat to the rich. So if you make it taboo to discuss those things you make it so that only those not bound by that taboo may participate.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      For what it’s worth, ALL technology connections videos have manually added English closed captions, not auto generated gibberish. It’s some of the best captioning work I’ve ever seen. He actually takes the time to sync them to the auto/video, prevents spoiling jokes/punchlines, and adds an Easter egg at the end of most episodes (usually describing the smooth jazz outro).

      You might actually have decent luck using the subtitle translation feature built into YouTube, since it (machine) translates the actual words Alec is saying.

      • Deebster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I always flick the subtitles on at the end to see how the jazz is described and how he transcribes his bloopers.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        And he’s spoken about doing it in part to ensure accessibility for the deaf, which I appreciate immensely as someone who grew up watching time delayed black box captions on whatever my mom was watching

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Alec is awesome. The content he makes isn’t really my cup of tea, but I recognize that that man has some serious game.

        I don’t find his videos to be entertaining, but they’re so educational that I watch them anyway.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Except the wind never runs out. Also we can use the energy from wind turbines 3x as efficiently as we can the energy from a barrel of oil. Carnot is a bitch.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Wind sometimes runs out (as in, calm weather) and wind turbines do eventually run out after a few decades. But, 3 gallons of gasoline-equivalent per minute seemed a bit small for my intuition, so I did some back of the envelope calculations to compare it to pumpjacks for oil.

          I’m doing these calculations in metric, because the US traditional units are insane, and nobody should subject themselves to that.

          3 gallons is about 11.3L, so 11.3L per minute is 678 L per hour, or about 16 kL of “gasoline-equivalent” per day.

          Apparently a pumpjack pumps about 5 to 40 “barrels” of crude oil per day. A barrel is 159 L so that’s 795 L to 6360 L per day.

          So, the back of the envelope “how much ‘energy’ does this big mechanical thing produce” seems fairly similar, ignoring a whole lot of complexity.

  • JackDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thanks for mentioning the last 30 minutes, but for additional clarity, there is a fake ending 30 minutes before the actual ending. Please watch those last 30 minutes!

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      1 day ago

      A technology connections video with a 30 minite rant??

      Isn’t that just the standard format for technology connections?

      Looks at runtime

      Oh, this is gonna be a good one!