I worry about this sometimes. I don’t ever want to be seen as speaking “for” minorities I’m not a member of, but I do want to be seen speaking “up for” them. And I worry about finding the right balance. I don’t want to speak over them, but do want to help make it clear that I support them and I am opposed to those who are opposed to them. I don’t want to be MLK’s “white moderate”.

It’s not true.

But if it was, it wouldn’t be a reason to dislike Postgres. Academic AI research in the '90s is a far cry from commercial AI companies today.

Thanks!

What’s the reference here?

Insomnia > Postman.

I switched to Insomnia around 2021 when Postman started enshittifying and found I liked it a lot more. Insomnia has also been relatively enshittified unfortunately, but it feels like it’s to a lesser extent.

it has been a rethorical one trying do point out the case of US-defaultism

No, I understood that. My reply was meant to be read as a rebuke to that idea. Because it isn’t an American day. It’s less observed in America than it is in many other countries. Claiming it to be US-defaultism relied on a mistaken assumption that because some Americans are talking about it, it must be a uniquely American thing.

Ironically, your complaint about “US-defaultism” was itself the US-defaultism.

And what does this strange word “international” mean???

It means international. As in it’s an official holiday in a bunch of countries, and unofficially observed to one degree or another in a whole heap more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Women’s_Day

(Note: disregard the map shown on this page. It’s unsourced and does not match the article’s text.)

Often, but not always, yes. If the misunderstanding is reasonable and they had ample opportunity for an explanation but didn’t, then yes, it’s an idiot plot.

If they legitimately didn’t have an opportunity to explain, or the explanation, while true, was completely unbelievable, that’s not an idiot plot IMO.

It’s gotten to the point where a lot of people very clearly think even the word conspiracy means “a crazy nonsense theory”. They’ll say “it’s not a conspiracy…” and then proceed to describe a textbook conspiracy.

Oh very interesting. Thanks for being so patient! I had no idea about this. I always just assumed that if a device said it supported 100M, that necessarily meant that if you connect a 10M device up to it, it’ll automatically take the lower speed. Like a car with a max speed of 10 can go on a road with a speed limit of 100…it’ll just be limited to 10. I didn’t realise it had to sync up like that.

Oh damn, really? So do normal home routers have to support basically every possible speed? Because I don’t think I’ve ever encountered or heard of someone encountering a failure due to a speed mismatch.

So what happens when that occurs? Does it just stop working, or does it work at the lower speed despite the lack of official “support” for it?

Wait so what would happen if it was only 1000? Like, can’t any connection automatically support up to its limit? What’s the advantage of explicitly supporting lower numbers?

Sorry, what is a “modem delete”, and how does all of this work if you just don’t choose to buy a router from your ISP at the time you first order an Internet plan from them? Like, it’s included there as a standard option with most ISPs, and they have instructions that at the very least seem simple (usually just making sure you have PPPoE with the right connection details, or IPoE set) to use.

Ok, so, do you agree with it? Or do you think that Notepad++ has demonstrated a good commitment to doing the right thing that means it’s still just as worthy of recommendation as it was last month?

Not my choice. But higher ups.

Ok, but your comment pretty clearly expressed an implied agreement with that choice.

I really like the idea of donating to a broader consortium, like the NLNet that’s suggested already, specifically because they give donations to less consumer-facing elements that might be less likely to attract direct funding.

Other than that though, I’d say donate to the things that (a) you already use a lot, and which (b) seem most in need of funding. If it’s big and famous and fairly stable without significant ongoing costs, it’s probably not as important to donate to. If it’s niche, needs a lot of development to add useful features or polish, or has significant ongoing costs (e.g. servers), that would be a higher priority. Evaluate based on whatever balance of those factors you choose.

That’s disappointing. Do you happen to know if fixing this up to work as expected is on the roadmap? Or something they’ve acknowledged and specifically rejected? Or no idea yet?

I’ve just come across this quite recent Reddit thread and have to be honest…it’s pretty much hit the nail on the head for me. Both the OP and many of the comments. bibober’s comment in particular.

If it’s just a lack of resources to develop these features quickly enough, that’s cool. But I’ll be extremely disappointed if they’ve decided that these are use cases they specifically don’t care about.

I’m a little stuck on permissions. I created a Space for my gaming group to move to Discord, and added a few rooms to it. I’m the admin, but I added a couple of other users as Mods. One of those mods added a Room to the Space. As a Space admin, I would expect to be able to edit a Room within my Space.

Documentation I’ve been able to find about it is mixed. The Space itself has a setting that says Moderators should be able to manage Rooms:

But various other threads have people suggesting it isn’t possible. Nothing clear in the official documentation I’ve found.

My own experience: I haven’t figured out if it’s possible or how to do it. I want users in my Space to automatically see all the Rooms, so they don’t have to go and look any time a new Room is created. And for permissions on the Space to flow to control over Rooms within it. Is this possible, to your knowledge?

So is it some ports support 10, some support 100, and some support the full 1000? Or how does it work with the three different speeds?