Let me put something else in your pipe to smoke:

Women rape men as frequently as men rape women.

And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate” - either by physical force or due to intoxication - at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011).

In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape - and why shouldn’t it be? - then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding: that women rape men as often as men rape women.

And yet, where are the convictions of female rapists??

crickets

If you want to clean house, start with your own.

And the real kicker comes down to these three points:

1. It took the FBI until 2015 to even begin recording female-on-male rape as rape, because before then it wasn’t considered rape. And so national law enforcement stats for female-on-make rape in America just don’t exist before 2015.
2. Many police precincts still use software that hard-codes the victim as female and the perp as male, further frustrating justice by creating “erroneous” records that are trivial to dismiss, and preventing a full accounting of the problem by preventing correct gender identification of the victim and perp.
3. Almost all men have been brainwashed to think that it is impossible for a woman to rape a man, be it physical or psychological coercion, so many of these male victims don’t even realize they have been victimized.

And the disparity of how society treats male rapists vs female rapists gets horrifically misandrist once you truly examine the rape of minors.

Because many male children raped by adult women get traumatized by the legal system as it extracts child support from them to pay their rapist for her crimes. And society celebrates and trivializes these rapes, with the media calling them “trysts” and “romps” and doing everything in its power to absolve the rapists of responsibility by making it look like the child was the aggressor.

tons of men in power who never get in trouble.

Here, people, is an absolutely exquisite example of the Apex Fallacy in action: using the 1% to 0.1% of men that fit the conditions and applying that case to the other 99% who don’t have these characteristics and could never achieve the same prosecutorial immunity.

For the vast majority of men, even the insinuation of sexual malfeasance is enough to destroy careers and marriages.

Hell, even good samaritans lose everything, and they did absolutely nothing wrong.

Even a “yes” can, and frequently is, converted into a “no” retroactively, sometimes well after the act. It all comes down to feelings before facts and how she personally prefers to interpret the event regardless of the passage of time.

And unless the entire action is videotaped and notarized, as a man you are defined as being in the wrong 100% of the time.

Plus, as a man you are also faced with epic levels of societal hypocrisy that you have no ability to counteract, regardless of how things actually went.

The only rational risk-assessment analysis for any man in the lower-90% is to consider ALL responses a “no”, and to just walk away.

Oh no! Forbidden

Error: access denied: denied by administrative rule fa68ec4c0b694396d50ce50a8cf4cb6b/81a4d3ff51d16981b7d8

Why am I seeing this?
If you have any issues contact the site administrator and provide the following Request ID along with your browser details, specially like the User-Agent: fa68ec4c0b694396d50ce50a8cf4cb6b

Protected by go-away :: Request Id fa68ec4c0b694396d50ce50a8cf4cb6b

Just some basic browser protections, and I get this. Is this enshittified Cloudflare v2.0?

“Prior transmissions of the strain did not have ‘close contact’.”

https://youtu.be/rO4Xd5PfIo0

Featuring Prof. Joseph Allen, Professor of Exposure Assessment Science at Harvard University.

I’m more inclined to listen to experts in their field.

Democrats are not “of the left”, they are actually right-lite.

Aside from a tiny handful of Dems like AOC and Bernie - who would be classified as solid centrists in any other country - there are no politicians “on the left” anywhere at the Federal level.

Relevant meme.

Invermectin does that in vino.

in vino.

What does wine have to do with it?

And is it white or red wine, or can we run with just any old plonk?

ducksandruns sorrynotsorry

Some variants like the Andes strain are developing the ability to be human-transmissible. It has been recorded jumping from one human host to the next in prior outbreaks. Once it evolves to be trivially-transmissible, all bets are off.

Even with the best medical care, Hantavirus has a 20% fatality rate.

Let’s just hope that conservatives continue being so anti-vaccine… a few more pandemics with human-transmissible highly-fatal viruses and maybe we can get that socialist utopia that the right always cock-blocks us from achieving.

Hand taser? Like, one of those easily-concealed ones?

A hand buzzer works, too, but it needs a certain amount of moisture on the skin to work, and foot dampness varies a lot more than hand dampness due to keratin and callouses.

I wouldn’t say the feminists I know believe any of that stuff. Most of them are focused on poverty and rape and how those things affect women.

I think you need to read this.

You aren’t the tail which wags the dog in feminist circles. The man-hating gender bigots who lead all these feminist organizations are the ones who control the narrative. The more hateful, spiteful, and extreme they are, the more they get celebrated as role models for young women.

what a sad way to go through life.

Yes, being obsessed with reality and those pesky facts and evidence is just so sad.

That link? Absolutely yikes. Vanishingly few people understand how virulently misandrist feminism is.

And those authors make the worst incel out there look like a rank amateur.

I gave you the names of three prominent feminist authors who worried about exactly that subject, and you are still calling bullshit?

You are really mired in anti-reality, and blind to real-world facts.

Literally just makes up a bunch of shit

Except I don’t have to. Plenty of women have blazed this path.

Most prominently:

• Sally Miller Gearhart
• Mary Daly
• Lois Waisbrooker

With plenty more waiting in the wings.

Finally,

https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1gtjhrv/debunking_feminists_help_men_too_lie/

Feminism isn’t about equality. It never was. It’s all about female supremacy, “special rights for me but not for thee”; about punishing men in the present for the sins of their fathers and grandfathers.

Yeah, it looks like Wikipedia says MGTOW is part of the manosphere and dominated by the far-right,

I think that specific article takes the prize for being by far the most blatantly inaccurate and downright socially poisoned article on Wikipedia.

It’s an extreme example of gender bigotry bias, and ideological “poisoning of the well” by female supremacists. It’s their straw man that they can point to and claim MGTOW is “misogynistic”.

The problem with most redpill communities is that they are recruiting fields for alt-right troglodytes. So most any incel forum will also be awash with appeals to emotion to blind the young men in there to the underlying alt-right messaging.

But MGTOW? Sure, some men are right-wing. But it’s hard to be of the right when the focus is on genuine self-improvement and brutally rational analysis.

After all, reality itself has a strong left-leaning bias.

You literally can.

Except I don’t have to. Plenty of women have blazed this path.

Most prominently:

• Sally Miller Gearhart
• Mary Daly
• Lois Waisbrooker

With plenty more waiting in the wings.

Finally,

https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1gtjhrv/debunking_feminists_help_men_too_lie/

Feminism isn’t about equality. It never was. It’s all about female supremacy, “special rights for me but not for thee”; about punishing men in the present for the sins of their fathers and grandfathers.

Can’t argue with a single point.

The main downside is that № 9 is a gateway to the redpill “manosphere”, which if they enter into incel communities this can go very bad for their mental health and interpersonal relationships.

It’s why I have always pushed people like this to the MGTOW communities, which are all about camaraderie, self-improvement, rational self-assessment, setting healthy boundaries, and cultivating intrinsic (internal) motivation such that companionship of any kind switches from a psychological necessity to a value-added prospect, where the man can trivially walk away if the value just isn’t there.

The irony being that,

1. Men are the overwhelming victims of non-reciprocal physically violent domestic violence; being about 71% of the victims.
2. Even in terms of random assaults by strangers, over 80% of the victims are men.
3. And finally, even if we look at the big kahuna of cross-gender rape, it turns out that women rape men as frequently as men rape women. It’s just that not only have most men been brainwashed into thinking that men cannot be raped, but that even the FBI did not consider it as rape until 2015 (so no national stats exist before this time), and even now many police precincts have software that hard-codes the victim as female and the perp as male, further corrupting justice.

That’s the entire joke, at least seen from the man’s side.

These femcels actually believe that they are involuntarily celibate, when it actually comes 100% down to them not wanting the lower-90% of men in any capacity except as simps to do things for them and beta orbiters to maintain their egos.

That doesn’t make them involuntarily celibate in any way, shape, or form, it just makes them deeply delusional of their own value, and horrendously self-sabotaging.

Honestly, the hate and gender bigotry coming out of those communities make male incels look like rank amateurs. Men are so wildly behind the curve - compared to women - where gender bigotry is concerned that I’m shocked that men are even considered a problem, much less the problem.

I mean, when was the last time you heard of men advocating to kill all women except for a small, select breeding population who exists purely to keep the population maintained?

And yet, this is the fave philosophy of several of feminism’s greatest founders and writers - to bring the male population down to (depending on who is doing the advocating) either less than 1% of the population, or even lower. That men’s only purpose should be for sperm production, and so vanishingly few men would ever be needed except as a minimum level of genetic diversity. These women are lauded and widely celebrated by feminists everywhere.

You literally cannot make this shit up.