oce 🐆

I try to contribute to things getting better, with sourced information, OC and polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with a point ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.

  • 3 Posts
  • 274 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle









  • oce 🐆@jlai.lutoScience Memes@mander.xyzScience is political.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    If you have a highly desired skill in developed countries, like medecine, engineering, highly skilled technician etc. it’s a good way to get a long term visa supported by the hiring organization. Usually those countries will advertise the professions they want next to professional visa procedures. Otherwise you can try to marry someone from there.








  • Why do you think this paper is more correct than the other? This paper seems to be locked on a single definition and says everything else is wrong because it does not follow this definition.

    Personally, I find it very intellectually unsatisfying because you can have a individual with male gametes but with a female phenotype, and this definition says, this individual’s sex is without a doubt 100% male. It seems the main benefit is not questioning a historical definition, which fits well with conservative opinions. There’s clear evidence on many other subjects that this can slow down or block science (ex: tobacco, climate).