So i thought this fits here, he calls the boat Helios 11 and builds it with very little experience. He docunents the adventure quite well and shares what he learns, and also shares all the plans for the boat for free.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Frankly waiting for the news story where he gets killed “proving” his concept…

    The first warning bell was “rated for cross-atlantic”… “rated” by whom?

    Of course then there’s the latter part where he talks about the next one is going to be super amazingly polished autonomous vessel with everything up to and including a sauna from the solar… And of course the sovereign citizen take…

    Cool doing a project like this, but it smells of overconfidence in what it currently is and how trivial it will be to get to something much much more…

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If only we could build an undersea country in this way, but without the psychopaths. And let the land people make hell for themselves if they want, just freedom for the sane ones.

  • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    2 days ago

    You might be better off buying an old aluminium tinny and modifying that. Lasts longer than plywood, and is already a boat. Hardest part done. Making a roof and adding solar panels is relatively easy

    • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Fiberglass and resin or epoxy on plywood can last very well and is easy to repair if you go for “work boat finish”.

      I have every book I can find on this. Phil Bolger, Dynamite Payson, Jim Michelak, all easy and good designs.

      The Birdwatcher style would lend itself well to solar panels, or Michelak’s IMB (International Marine Beacher, from a magazine competition).

      I have a half-built “Cartopper” in my shed. I need to go work on it more. Sometimes it’s more fun to read about than do.

        • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          And yes, Birdwatcher is great. I bought the plans for IMB; if I ever finish this one, that’s next. It is just short enough to not have to be registered in my state, and you can camp in it easily. And I think the sit inside with windows thing is neat. Safer to bring nieces and nephews along.

          Actually the cartopper was used as a guest cabin towed behind a larger boat also, but one person only.

          Here is a video of someone sailing the IMB https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XGVhZzj3JlE

        • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Judging by the book, he did his rowing version in like 4 days lol. I started 16 months ago, just haven’t worked on it much. Hull is ready to glass, sailing stuff needs to be built, got the lead sitting there ready to weight centerboard and everything. Life just got in the way.

          I probably have only worked on it for about 20-30 hours total, and that was with a whole lot to learn. Had to attempt the stem bevel 3 times before I gave in and bought an old bandsaw used for $200 to make it easier. I’ve just never done anything like this, so when I go out there now, I just read the book and get a bit intimidated by what is left.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the best option is to take two old sailboats (already efficient hulls) and connect them together into a large catamaran with a platform in between them. This greatly increases the possible surface area for solar panels, with a minimum of water resistance added. It allows you to add a large section of solar panels in the middle without anything adding drag in the water in that section.

      • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        LOL! That’s the best option? Why wouldn’t you just start with a catamaran?

        If you ever built a thing like that please give me the link to your YouTube, that would be funny as hell to watch.

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        A single-hull can be made self-righting, in case it flips in bad weather. A 35 foot catamaran? You’re not getting that back up-right with a crew of one - you basically hope and pray a bigger boat comes along at that point.

        … Now I’ve watched the video, there is no ballast, not even a dedicated bilge space, and with the shallow draft, I am uncertain how the boat in OOP isn’t too top-heavy to stay up-right. Forget the “Sovereign Living” bit at the end, I’mma need to see some solid design and build data before listening to another word from that guy.

        In short: I take back any mean things I said or implied about Catamarans.

        I was just stanning one of my favorite things about, and pet criteria for, properly-designed boats. I just sold my first sail-boat because I wanted a bigger one, with a better capsize-rating.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          there is no ballast, not even a dedicated bilge space, and with the shallow draft, I am uncertain how the boat in OOP isn’t too top-heavy to stay up-right. Forget the “Sovereign Living” bit at the end, I’mma need to see some solid design and build data before listening to another word from that guy.

          Don’t worry, he said up front it is “rated for cross-atlantic” so it’s all good.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Now I’ve watched the video, there is no ballast

          He does end up adding ballast later. Added batteries, living stuff and about 150KG of rocks.

          His takeaway was that it didn’t really affect cruising speed and that he should have made a sturdier, heavier bottom hull.

          Edit: he’s in the process of turning it into a trimaran at the moment also for stability.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Except that the risk of a 35 foot catamaran flipping over is very significantly lower in the first place.

      • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Catemaran hulls are specifically designed as such, you can’t use normal hulls.

        You do gain the extra room for solar, but equally you also make the boat wider, making it less flacrical in confined waterways like canals and rivers.

        In high latitudes having a vertical solar sail might actually work quite well to well as both a solar array and a wind sail. But that will require significant engineering design time to get right.

      • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Uhm. This is not done by welding a bit or using big bolts. If done wrong, your “catamaran” will not survive a single wave, let alone the conditions of the open sea. Don’t forget how much force water has.

        So if you do this on a lake, you’ll be fine, but not in open waters.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      maybe star/save your comment or something because i am doing the same. i’m planning on kitting out my camping setup with solar so i can take our ebikes with us and i bet this video has all the info i need (i am pretty sure i have it all figured out except the precise wiring but more knowledge never hurt okay i just thought up an exception to that but you know what i mean) i am not pausing babylon 5 tho

      • D_C@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        On my version of Boost there are options to see your upvoted etc, and saved posts, but it doesn’t work anymore

        It did work. I atarted out saving things here and there and then an update wiped it all out and no longer works. Or it didn’t the last time I tried it

  • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I remember reading about a Finn who spent 5 years, half part calculating, half building a small aeroplane in his apartment. Neighbours were let in on the knowing when he needed them to open their doors to poke a plane part into their apartements to get the thing down from IIRC third floor and out.

    He flew it too!

    I read it in the early nineties and the thing was maybe from the eighties. He didn’t solder anything but drilled like 30.000 holes and riveted it all together.

    Finns are cool.

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    He want’s to make it

    AI controlled

    aww man

    I respect his solar commitement, but listening to him it’s obvious he’s a libertarian Elon-Bro… my immediate reaction is “oh no… it’s stupid.”

    And the concept isn’t new, solar boats have been a thing for ages now and most of them are (like @OwOarchist@pawb.social suggested) catamarans or trimarans.

      • _nb@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        AI is completely irrelevant to his project, I really don’t know why he mentioned that. The solar/battery/motor setup looks like off-the-shelf from victron — we can see a screenshot of the app at some point.

    • Steve@slrpnk.net
      shield
      M
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d like to second Povoq’s request and ask that we’re more mindful of the words we choose and their impact please.

    • jmill@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh, it’s OK, he specifically addressed how to get good AI results. He commanded Chat-GPT to give him good info. If you just ask nicely it won’t work, you have to be forceful. Forget boat building, he should clearly be teaching classes on using LLMs.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly not a terrible use of ai. I imagine it’s pretty good at spotting things in a sparse environment like the middle of the ocean.

            • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Quite frankly, in the last two years, I’ve accepted the AI term because that’s pretty close to what we expected sci-fi AI to be.

              Something that you talk to that understands from the context what you mean and that calls the appropriate tool is exactly things like Jarvis, like HAL 9000.

              • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s a fair point, we also called video game enemy algorithm AI.

                But no one calls that AI, I think the key indicator is a statistical model instead of a human coded script

      • hayvan@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes and no. “AI” has been a marketing term over a decade now, it’s a vague statement which is pretty much mandatory to get funding.

        In theory, I agree with you, automated navigation of boats seems like a good fit for machine learning.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Technically over a decade, but feels like that’s an understatement.

          In the 1940s some people called a machine to play NIM as “Artificial Intelligence”. People talked about opponent AI in checkers games before most of us were born.

          Certainly by the 80s using “AI” to describe the manipulations of enemy characters was all-in.

          • hayvan@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That’s why AI means everything and nothing. In games, computer controllwd characters are called AI, although they are straightforward algorithms. It’s a catch-all term.

            In early 2000s, at least in the academia, we used AI to refer to neural networks, although it wasn’t a strict term. Then anything machine learning (including regression models) were called AI, now LLMs and chatbots are called AI while other type of models are pretty much ignored. A boat navigation system could use a neural network but almost definitely not a language model at its core.

    • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      AI can be fine, I cringed at the mention of Starlink, even though that’s a case where it makes sense.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        There’s currently not really an alternative to Starlink for this type of use sadly. If speed isn’t a concern then there are, but for typical internet usage there really isn’t.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No, he only says that it is affordable to a medium sized budget.

      My educated guess is that it costs around 25,000€ to build this. The ePropulsion engine and battery you can see in the video is about 10,000€ of that.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      But do you want to Morty your life?

      But I appreciate your comparison, it really is analagous to an overconfident jr dev code scenario. Anyone who actually knows understands he’s lucky it’s still intact and cringes at his ‘rated for cross-atlantic’ statement. But it’s been fine so far, so he feels super vindicated into extrapolating to how awesome it’s going to be if he managed to get the basics this in order.

      I went in prepared to be unambiguously appreciative of the adventuresome spirit, but turned to dismay as he spoke on what he thought the boat was capable of and close to being. Good job on the adventure, but need to have a bit more humility or he’ll be in over his head, literally.