• vithigar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    I cancelled my Netflix several years ago literally the very first time I got an error that too many people were watching or a screen wasn’t authorized or whatever the specific “you can’t share your account anymore” error was at the time.

    The fact that account sharing was tacitly allowed was literally the only thing keeping the value proposition of having the account afloat.

  • sudo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 hours ago

    To be fair, too many people are using your account. 0 people should be on it.

    • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I pay for Netflix and share with my sister in laws family and they pay for Hulu and Disney plus. Good trade off imo

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Fuck em. Lots of free media out there. My local library has all sorts of stuff, and that’s not even considering what’s out on the high seas.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Just one reason their stock price is down. They no longer report subscriber numbers — you can probably guess why. It’s strange to me that a public company can just hide data from investors that might reveal when a company isn’t doing so hot.

    It’s also stupid they would clamp down like this on ad-supported plans. Advertisers want eyeballs, and this means less of them. Reminds me of Reddit moving to a log-in only model.

    https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/07/15/with-netflix-down-45-from-its-highs-viewer-engagem/

    https://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-engagement-data-earnings-subscribers-stock-wall-street-2026-7

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      the biggest reason is, them cancelling too many shows too soon. after 1-2 season, the show ceases to ecist. 3 if you are lucky and its thier way of forcing its end.

    • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      They aren’t stopping reporting subscriber numbers, what are you talking about? They’re dropping from reporting it twice a year to just once a year. Annual growth is really all that matters after all. What matters far more is revenue, profit, and cash flow - all of which are still reported regularly.

      Stock prices falling after earnings calls is basically the norm because no matter how well they go, even beating expectations, some people wanted more - and you can’t ignore the market manipulation by big players who try to manufacture drops so they can increase their position. Spook people to sell and drop the price so they can buy more at a reduced price.

      Netflix need or exceeded their targets as they have basically every single time for years. Their revenue grew double digits, their margins are getting healthier, and their viewing hours increased.

    • Switorik@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I will never understand investors. Anyone with half a brain can put two and two together when a company starts hiding anything. Investors have no idea what they’re doing, they just trust the customer will make them money, get angry when they’ve been duped, and will do it again.

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Not all investors are in it for the long run. Some just expect a short boost or go short betting on a loss.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        In this case, the ads are probably bringing in less per viewer than the service costs, so having non-paying viewers is still a net negative.

        Clamping down on this is probably a worse negative in the long run, but investors only care about this quarter.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Considering how many streamers are encouraging people to sign up for the ad-supported plans, I think they’re making more money from the ads. Of course, they’re double-dipping just like the cable companies used to do. Charging for a subscription, and then making even more money by showing you ads. The OP’s screenshot is like how they used to charge for each cable descrambler box in a home. Wanna watch in both the bedroom and the living room? Pay up!

          It’s just greed.

    • Hazzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Advertisers want eyeballs, and this means less of them. Reminds me of Reddit moving to a log-in only model.

      Not sure if you’re being rhetorical, but I’ll answer anyways. The reason Reddit wants you to log in is to better track you, no duh. The reason that makes them more money is because better data means better ad targeting, and better ad targeting can be translated to results like a better click through rate. When a platform has that, they can incentivize more advertisers to spend more money on their platform.

      That way, each time they sell an ad, that ad can be more expensive. It’s undeniable that demanding logins will be bad for the number of ads they sell, but if they can sell higher quality ads, they’ll make more money at the end of the day.

      This whole thing is the core driver behind privacy being eroded at scale, because ad targeting has proven effective, and so advertisers want to advertise on the platform with the best targeting. So everyone wants to spy on their users the best and build the best targeting.

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Plex. Jellyfin is fine too, I am just used to Plex and prefer it’s interface. I don’t mind paying a few dollars per month for it.

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is coming from a person with a Plex lifetime pass for the last 15 years. Fuck Plex and their greed.

      I was on the same boat as you, but this year I switched to Jellyfin and could not be happier. It actually feels smoother for me than Plex. Also there are a pot of little quality of life improvements which did not work on Plex for me, like always auto loadng subtitles in my language of choice.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Plex is good for those in our circles who only know of VPNs from ads on YouTube.

        Jellyfin is great and all but not something you can just expose to the internet and hope for the best.

      • Billegh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Plex will also auto select subtitles for your language of you set it up, and jellyfin currently can desync subtitles if you skip forward enough.

        I don’t really have a preference between the two, but jellyfin still feels rough around the edges in places.

  • nomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Just download the content in the app and disconnect the internet before watching…

  • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Their content has quickly become shit tier. Every new show seems like an attempt to check as many boxes as their hits from over five years ago. Spreadsheet programming. That or low budget docuseries.

    But that’s programming everywhere now. Who woulda thought that consolidating the entire entertainment industry into three players would have negative consequences.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I think I’ve watched things on like five devices at once on my Jellyfin. Never had this issue.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The stress test I did had 6 transcoding streams going on my Emby server with an Intel Arc A310, without breaking a sweat. It never has more than 3 streams going at a time in normal usage though so I stopped testing at 6.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I continue to be glad I’ve not paid for a streaming service, cable, satellite, or any other tv/media service in the entirety of my life.

    My mother stopped paying for satellite tv in like 2014ish, my sister stopped paying for Netflix in 2019, and I’ve provided an Emby server with an Ombi and arr stack based requests system to my whole family since 2017.

    Those services have done more than enough to prove they don’t deserve my money.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’d still be downloading Torrents which isn’t possible or preferable for everybody.

      A good solution is to add a cheap debrid service that acts as a downloader+cache for the torrents and serves them to you at gigabit speeds. Torbox has a $3/month subscription that would already make your experience extremely good.