• 11 Posts
  • 800 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 16th, 2024

help-circle
  • I do believe that would insinuate a desire to perform sodomy in a domineering fashion, over said person.

    Sodomy is of course inferred by the presumed gender of both individuals. There could of course be other penetrative sexual acts (as such is the strict connotation of the verb “fuck”, in this context), not necessarily sodomy, though barring other qualifiers, it is the default.

    To perform a penetrative sexual act, it is assumed that the person making the statement has a member capable of performing said act. This may be organic or prosthetic, and some may who have an organic member may choose to use a prosthetic, or elect a champion as part of the original phrasing (I.e. “fuck (subject) with a donkey dick”). What is important, however, is that the speaker has some capability of performing the penetrative sexual activity prior to making the statement, or, at a minimum, a concept of a plan.







  • JasonDJ@lemmy.ziptoScience Memes@mander.xyzbe a friend to the animals
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Does this kill the bug?

    Like, for real…what are the chances of the bug getting hit by the blade, in the first place? Its one fast blade vs one real small bug. Possibly one with the gift of flight.

    Then it’s in a bag full of grass. And aren’t most bugs passive breathers? So wouldn’t all the air rushing through the vacuum into the bag just like, idk, give them superpowers or something?



  • JasonDJ@lemmy.ziptoScience Memes@mander.xyzbe a friend to the animals
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mowed and bagged all the leaves in my backyard and put them in my chickens run. They loved it…

    The leaves in the front yard got blown to the “woods” between my neighbor and I.

    After I mowed up most the leaves in the back, I did another pass with a lower deck setting to get most the pine needles/cones…those went in the woods (the girls don’t like too many needles)…then blew what needles/cones/dog poop remained into a pile, mowed that up (dumped in woods).

    Whatever was left got blown under the deck.

    Did I do good?




  • Fork the repo.

    Ask an LLM to rename all the variables and add comments and docstrings. Give it your style guide (assuming you have one).

    Ask another LLM to check their work.

    Done.

    Disclaimer: I’m not a programmer, I’m a network engineer who dabbles in automation and scripting. But it seems to me that grunt work like this is what LLMs are really good for.

    Also I only use short variable names inside of loops (for i in iterable…). Is that not how it should be done?