
Operation Devils Triangle.
Operation Silent Boof.

Operation Devils Triangle.
Operation Silent Boof.

“I did not have sexual relations with that Clinton”
Narrator: it was Socks
I feel so seen right now.
I’d imagine it involves Monica.
Either Lewinsky, or the one from Friends. Could go either way.
Does this kill the bug?
Like, for real…what are the chances of the bug getting hit by the blade, in the first place? Its one fast blade vs one real small bug. Possibly one with the gift of flight.
Then it’s in a bag full of grass. And aren’t most bugs passive breathers? So wouldn’t all the air rushing through the vacuum into the bag just like, idk, give them superpowers or something?
Officially it was a suicide. Or at least according to the Don(ald).
I mowed and bagged all the leaves in my backyard and put them in my chickens run. They loved it…
The leaves in the front yard got blown to the “woods” between my neighbor and I.
After I mowed up most the leaves in the back, I did another pass with a lower deck setting to get most the pine needles/cones…those went in the woods (the girls don’t like too many needles)…then blew what needles/cones/dog poop remained into a pile, mowed that up (dumped in woods).
Whatever was left got blown under the deck.
Did I do good?
Trump voters wanted Survivor and got pedo-Dexter.
Laziest fucking final season of any (mostly awesome, save for a couple seasons) show.
So bad they had to write a whole new final season years later. Which also wasn’t that great. But still an improvement.
Yeah I script more than anything…python, bash, powershell, etc.
Only terrible code I inherit is the stuff I wrote >=3 months ago. I’ll keep saying that three months from now, too.
Fork the repo.
Ask an LLM to rename all the variables and add comments and docstrings. Give it your style guide (assuming you have one).
Ask another LLM to check their work.
Done.
Disclaimer: I’m not a programmer, I’m a network engineer who dabbles in automation and scripting. But it seems to me that grunt work like this is what LLMs are really good for.
Also I only use short variable names inside of loops (for i in iterable…). Is that not how it should be done?

How is that homophobic?
That’s just saying that Trump is submissive.
Nothing gay about exchanging blowjobs for favors. That’s just business.

Meh, at least you didn’t tell me to get the stick out of my ass.
Progress.

Oh it is 100%. Democrats stopped using “gay” as a pejorative like 25 years ago. We all agreed not to anymore.
Basically, when Idiocracy came out with the line “You’re fucked up…you talk like a f*g, and your shit’s all ret*rded”, we realized that there’s no way a better insult could be crafted around sexuality or disability, so we all gave up.
Hey man don’t knock boxed wine. It’s plenty delicious, more efficient to ship, and just as effective. Its a great everyday wine.
Ahh that’s why he’s still supporting Trump. He likes getting fucked in the ass., but doesn’t want to be called “gay”. Poor little snowflake.
Lol did you see how much money the establishment threw against him?
Your whole narrative (after the second sentence) falls apart against that.
Try harder. Maybe try writing in a Cyrillic alphabet first.
I think he is a baby cowboy, or he aspires to be one.
I do believe that would insinuate a desire to perform sodomy in a domineering fashion, over said person.
Sodomy is of course inferred by the presumed gender of both individuals. There could of course be other penetrative sexual acts (as such is the strict connotation of the verb “fuck”, in this context), not necessarily sodomy, though barring other qualifiers, it is the default.
To perform a penetrative sexual act, it is assumed that the person making the statement has a member capable of performing said act. This may be organic or prosthetic, and some may who have an organic member may choose to use a prosthetic, or elect a champion as part of the original phrasing (I.e. “fuck (subject) with a donkey dick”). What is important, however, is that the speaker has some capability of performing the penetrative sexual activity prior to making the statement, or, at a minimum, a concept of a plan.