• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have no problem with a mod that changes someone’s sexual orientation, someone’s race, someone’s species, or just plain removes or adds new characters. Why would I care how someone else is playing a game?

        • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s honestly surprising to me the bigots haven’t set up their own mod hosting site. They’ve done it for everything else when they’ve been told that they’re asshats.

          • pory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s free to host a mod on github. Mods like this and the pride flag remover for Spooderman are just trolls seeking attention and outrage, so they have to make sure to be very visible and find-able. Nexus has no obligation to host those files and if the modders actually wanted to play the game with the changes (and enable others to do so) it’s totally possible to do that without Nexus. They upload to Nexus (which has a clear policy against this) so that they get exposure when “journalism” reports their mod being deleted (since talking about this is free Engagement™)

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You don’t have to care. No one does. No one is blocking this from working.

      It’s just not being listed on Nexus.

      Moreover this mod wasn’t giving options to players to choose how they wanted to play, it was changing very specific things and advertising it. Nexus doesn’t care to let them use their platform to advertise a mod made for a very specific audience of really shitty people.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        No one does.

        This is patently false because if no one cares, it wouldn’t have been removed. It was only removed because enough people cared and spoke up about it. Even just reading this thread makes it clear that plenty of people care about it.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          This comment would mean anything if they had said “no one cares,” but what they said was “no one has to care”

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I’m an idiot who can’t read. Potentially… I see they edited their post.

            • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I feel like there’s a smidge of ambiguity in the phrase

              You don’t have to care. No one does.

              Which could parse to

              You don’t have to care. No one has to care.

              or

              You don’t have to care. No one cares.

              • Omega@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                11 months ago

                I actually don’t think it is ambiguous. “You don’t have to care” implies that some might, but it doesn’t matter. “No one does” is clearly reinforcing that point, rather than making a new point which contradicts the first part of the first point.

                • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Not if you read cardfully, but it is easy to gloss over. I’d give them a pass, especially since changing your opinion when presented with different information isn’t nearly common enough.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah I already admitted I’m an idiot that can’t read, assuming they didn’t edit this part of their post.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Literally the only care that mattered in this situation is the admin(s) at Nexus mods, and they didn’t have to even care that much. The thing could be removed with about 5 minutes of work, if that. Nexus has shown that they will not platform bigotry, and this is them following through on that once again. Other people’s opinions didn’t even matter.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      It really depends, but in general if you feel that lgbt characters or black characters hinder your enjoyment of the game enough to bother modding them away or different then it speaks about who you are in a way that tells me that I dislike you

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      rugged individualism is not the path to a functioning society. in any society worth living in there are certain views that cannot be tolerated. the kind of bigotry expressed by the mod creator is one of those views that cannot be tolerated.

    • Cornpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Right? Like who gives a fuck lol it’s their game. If they aren’t comfortable with gay characters because they are still in the closet or some shit they should be able to play a game without it if they want.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        And they can, and if Nexus has a problem with hosting homophobic mods, they should be able to not host them

        • Cornpop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yep. I just don’t get the outrage I guess. It’s like people are surprised racists and bigots exist.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I can absolutely understand these people being outraged when someone releases a mod that exists solely to erase them the same way they’d been erased from western media since western media was a thing.

            • Cornpop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              21
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I mean this is nothing new. Racism exists and it’s only natural that it spills over to mods. Just skip it and move on and fuck the haters. My point is that it’s better to just ignore than to give it attention. The attention is what the bigots are really after. Giving it to them is what they want. The mod creator that built this is absolutely loving how things are going here.

              • Leg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Ignoring racism and bigotry has literally never worked, outside of maintaining personal delusions. The more comfortable people are in their hatred, the more bold they become in acting on it. Slavery and genocide happen for a reason, and it’s in part because people don’t take that shit seriously until it’s too late.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Ignoring it makes it seem like it’s okay. Calling out bigotry is how we show people that it isn’t acceptable.

              • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’m tired of being quiet about hateful content. I’ll call it out and hope they get their nexus account banned if they keep it up. I’d rather review bomb it in force to show the public opinion.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Right? This is entirely opt-in. Who cares how other people are playing out their fantasies at home? I literally don’t care if someone else is racist or homophobic as long as they’re not pushing that shit on kids, employment prospects, housing decision, or whatever.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nobody is preventing them to play their games how they want.

        Nexus just doesn’t want to have those mods on their platform.

        They can just find some other platform to host those mods if they want. Or keep them to themselves.

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          11 months ago

          My point isn’t about them. My point is about you and media companies deciding who gets a platform and then acting like the people you silence are the ones oppressing and censoring. I’m not a Republican. I’m gay AF. I simply loathe double standards and hate seeing Facebook decide who gets heard.

          • zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            This is a stupid take. You’re tired of the people who own and use a platform controlling that platform to represent their morals? If you want a platform to host bigotry, you should make one. They often do so well. Just because someone has something to stupid say doesn’t mean others have to tolerate it in their home or place of business.

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              27
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Nexus mods is doing the bigotry through their removal here. Look in the mirror. Companies are not people.

              Have fun with the political landscape being controlled by billionaires. If it’s ok for us, it’s ok for them. Nobody is gonna stop them with hypocrisy and less money.

              • Fluke@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Nexusmods are doing what they believe is the right thing to attain the highest profit, it’s no more complex than that.

                The people in charge voted on where the line in the sand should be (to simplify the corporate process somewhat) and homophobia, they decided, should be on the wrong side. They figure that inclusivity, rather than bigotry, is the way to more customers. (I mean, duh.)

                They are entitled to do just that, as the modder is to mod the game how he sees fit.

                It is not bigotry to be intolerant of the intolerant, that pathetic argument has been dead since before you were born.

                • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  It’s fascinating watching how quickly my side has forgotten the state and corporate censorship of the 2000s. I don’t enjoy defending rightoids but I remember being on the losing side and I’d rather be principled now than on the backfoot again when the pendulum swings back.

                • Mango@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Truth and fairness take a back seat to profits. Got it.

                  It’s not intolerant to offer an alternative game experience for those who might choose it. You’re so lost in the juice that you’re ok with doing things the wrong way so long as it supports your side.

                  My problem here is that the same mechanism that entities Nexus mods to do this is the one that lets Facebook give Trump a win. You’re all blind to that though because you think this random guy is hurting gays or whatever with a game option that’s not imposed on anyone.

                  You can’t see the forest for the trees.

                  • Ender of Games@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Truth and fairness take a back seat to profits. Got it.

                    I see you are incapable of reading, so I’ll just restate this to make it simple for you:

                    It is not bigotry to be intolerant of the intolerant, that pathetic argument has been dead since before you were born.

          • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            So private platform and private parties shouldn’t have the right to moderate and regulate their own spaces?

            • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Platforms with near-monopoly level control of public discussion should be considered part of the public forum. This weird libertarianism from “lefties” deeply concerns me.

                • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Nobody made you open up a social space to the public, and nobody is making you keep it open. Also I want you to explain how you can reconcile being on the left but also supporting corporate rights over those of individual humans?

                  • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You didn’t answer my question.

                    Who would pay for the platform, and who would moderate it? Or do you just want even more hate speech to spread?

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              11 months ago

              Major media outlets and companies should not be considered private platforms. Anyone can sign up and post while they use their money and influence to decide who gets heard. This is a problem, and I’m pretty ticked off about how people don’t seem to mind when it’s in their favor. Double standards are bad, no matter which side.

              Do you think Facebook should get to control which posts rise up and which fall with their analytics around election time? Me neither. Sometimes you gotta put up with some ugly if you don’t want people silenced for their perspective. I don’t want an echo chamber.

              • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Major media outlets and companies should not be considered private platforms.

                Really? Now I’m curious, how do you imagine that?

                I assume the company still pays for the platform, hosting, development, etc. Since it’s public, are they now subsidised by taxes?

                Who moderates the platforms then? Are is it all just unmoderated?

                Will companies get compansated for lost revenue?

                I genuinely curious how you imagine this working.

                Anyone can sign up and post while they use their money and influence to decide who gets heard.

                Yeah, because it’s theirs. They own it.

                If I let everyone into my house for a party, doesn’t mean I lose the right to kick people out.

                Sometimes you gotta put up with some ugly if you don’t want people silenced for their perspective. I don’t want an echo chamber.

                I’m okay with an echo chamber if it means I don’t have to put up with CP and jihadi execution footage in my cute cat feed.

                I assume it would be no problem for you.

                • Mango@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’m only coming from the standpoint of how dangerous it is for a mass media outlet to control who has a voice. I don’t know how we can articulate this fairly and would like help for that, but I’m not gonna find help in a sea of people who just wanna take sides and ignore the means.

                  Why should anyone get to own the only effective avenues of communication? Communication is what determines how the world works.

                  CP is illegal obviously, and jihad doesn’t make sense in the cute cats category the way ‘straight only game mod’ makes sense in the ‘game mod’ category.

                  • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Why should anyone get to own the only effective avenues of communication? Communication is what determines how the world works.

                    Who currently owns the “only effective avenues of communication”?

                    CP is illegal obviously, and jihad doesn’t make sense in the cute cats category the way ‘straight only game mod’ makes sense in the ‘game mod’ category.

                    “Sometimes you gotta put up with some ugly if you don’t want people silenced for their perspective.” Seems there’s a limit to the ugly you’re willing to put up with, and you’re quite willing to silence perspectives yourself.

                    You cleaely still want people to moderate social networks. I assume you’d want these people to outside the company?

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        i don’t care if someone is racist or homophobic unless it affects me

        this is a libertarian fever dream. the nature of prejudice is that it does affect other people.

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          11 months ago

          Did you literally just use quote notation except change my words? Go fuck yourself.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You should want to make racists uncomfortable when they do a racism, and bigots uncomfortable when they do a bigotry. It’s part of the hidden contract to living in a nice society. Stand up for others who are affected even if you are not. Shit is not cool, and you should care that your brothers and sisters are being marginalized.