The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

*Unless Facebook is the one doing the unreasonable search, and we simply buy their data

most likely they weren’t even recording.

Sweet summer child

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

*Unless Facebook does the unreasonable searching and we pay them for any data they collect

I protest against this for the same reason I would protest against the government flying tens of thousands of drones around the city to track every person’s whereabouts and location history. Facebook gives the police unfettered access to their information. It’s like a Ring doorbell, but dumber looking and it moves around.

If you’re sitting next to me with these fuckass glasses on, then you are giving the government live video feed of me. The only difference between this and a drone that’s personally following me is that technically, this doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment because the government isn’t the one sending a mindless drone after me with a camera, Facebook is. It’s only technically not a violation of my right to privacy, in the same way that deporting people for saying “from the river to the sea” is only technically not a violation of the First Amendment.

You would have fought for the confederacy because it was legal to own slaves

Just because you don’t have a legal right not to be filmed without your consent doesn’t mean that you don’t have a moral right not to be filmed without your consent

You actually should advocate for violence against people who are violating your rights

Yeah, putting cameras in glasses is a really stupid idea

“I fucking boffed it dude”

Probably because you realized that you were reading stuff that I didn’t write. I probably wouldn’t have responded, but drive-by downvotes remind me of reddit, and I can’t stand redditors

What a weird comment to downvote. Literally just factual information. Thankfully I saw this before the deletion, so I can still call you out for having the reading comprehension of… well, an average Lemmy user tbh

So obviously I didn’t encourage people to leech. I was literally only talking about the legal aspect of streaming pirated content. I don’t actually know if avoiding seeding keeps you legally safe when torrenting, so I avoided commenting on that

Xenophytophilia is my favorite word in the English language

Which of these projects is he still in control of, and still making money off of?

I don’t know how it is in your region, but where I live (the US), streaming pirated content is perfectly legal. As long as you aren’t distributing it, you’re not actually violating any laws. The only thing a free VPN is good for is masking your location so that you can get around porn bans and region locks

Basically the thing that turned the internet against Honey, but when a homophobic piece of shit does it it’s fine

deleted by creator

Unfortunately it knew you would do that and already contacted the police. The moment you steal it, you get arrested

Their machine should be able to predict how dumb and irrational I am. Even if there is necessarily no downside to taking both boxes, I only take the mystery box.

If I end up taking both boxes, then the machine may or may not have predicted that. But if I end up only taking the mystery box, then I doubt the machine would have predicted that I’d take both. I’m walking away with that cool mil

More turtles

Bro my vegetarian ass is like 30% black beans by volume. Someone please infect me with the beans virus