• UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 minutes ago

    Pizza that traditionally comes with sauce on top would be better if you did no sauce on top and instead dipped the pizza in sauce as you ate. I like my crunchy.

  • webdoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That smart phones are surveillance/psyop devices, and that they own you, not them. I’ve been 100% phone free for 5 years now. I’m a 30+ Year IT expert. Also, fuck A.I.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s cheese curds and gravy that make it a poutine, not cheese. You can put cheese AND cheese curds on a poutine along with other stuff, but without cheese curds, all you have is fries and gravy with assorted hangers on.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Bigotry is bad. Segregation is bad.

    In progressive spaces this is USUALLY met with agreement. That’s easy whenever we are talking about equal rights for people who have been historically been oppressed. However, a dark corner of progressive spaces likes to hate. Hate on men, cis people, white people. It’s usually just one or two people, who have probably been personally hurt by people who happen to fall into those groups, and the rest don’t feel like they can say anything.

    I strongly believe that things like segregation are fundamentally wrong and make the world a worse place. Not that they were tools that were used for evil and can now be used for good in the right hands. Not just temporarily as balancing measures for society. Equality isn’t just something you can pick and choose when to believe in, when it’s pretty and convenient and makes you feel good.

  • rozodru@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If you’re walking down stairs or an escalator you stand/walk on the right. always. If you live in a country that drives on the left side then you apply the same to stairs.

    When walking on the sidewalk you pass on the right.

    People who walk down the opposite side are a cancer to society.

    • hbar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Adding to this, if a group is walking together shoulder to shoulder taking up most of the sidewalk, it’s that groups responsibility to stack when a single person is coming. The single walker should not have to move off the sidewalk to accommodate.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      When walking on the sidewalk you pass on the right.

      You walk on the right, but if someone is slow, and there’s no room on the right, you can def pass them on the left. Like driving.

      • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        This is terrible driving advice. Just because other people suck at lane management doesn’t mean you need to make the roads even more unsafe. Maybe just wait?

  • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Playing noise on your phone in a public place is wrong. Violators should be put in one those midevil contraptions that lock your head and wrists in a plank of wood so that we may all pelt you with rotten fruit and vegetables.

    No one wants to hear that shit. You’re an asshole and should feel bad.

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      To extend that, people that have there notification sound on all the time is really annoying, just leave it on vibrate it’s just as useful!

  • borokov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I said in a meeting “that’s a really bad idea”

    They still did it.

    During years, we had trouble with it. I kept saying “I told you it was a bad idea”.

    After 6 years, they finally removed it. I said “well, I said it was a bad idea”.

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I was once a consultant for wine companies. I was working on helping establish a new wine brand. The client was really clear that they did not want to rely on the idea of terroir, nor their vineyards closeness to the ocean as selling points.

    My boss thought the brand should use a bunch sails and anchor imagery to sell the terroir and the vineyard’s closeness to the ocean.

    I told him the client wouldn’t like it as they’d been clear that’s not what they wanted. He said I was wrong. If he’d told me the client was wrong that would have been fine but he insisted that I had heard it wrong and started gas lighting me.

    Turns out the client felt they’d been really clear that they didn’t want a brand that focused on the terroir and closeness to the ocean and refused to pay for that round of work.

    • hefty4871@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      TIL Terroir means “the complete natural environment in which a particular wine is produced, including factors such as the soil, topography, and climate”

  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    At work, I had to design something for a new software product and realized that if we applied the same approach as our old product we were going to run into major scalability issues. The problem is the whole organization was basically used to the product working this old way. For months, people tried to ignore the scalability issues and push forward with the old approach in the new product. I kept being a pest though and pointing it out. Eventually, I wrote a several page document with data and graphs explaining exactly what the problem was and presented it to other teams. I also did research and found that our competitors were doing it my way, which I attributed to the scalability issues inherent to the problem. This forced everyone to accept the problem and eventually my solution. It was really hard to basically be fighting against a mob mentality and feel like the only sane one. It was also hard because even after the solution was accepted people were still upset about the change. In my view, this was like being angry at the laws of gravity. You can feel that way, but it doesn’t change that they exist and you have to accept them.

  • aMockTie@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    They tried to argue that all math was useless bullshit because it couldn’t deal with infinity.

    I tried to show different ways math has been useful for me personally, and for humanity generally. None of that mattered to them. I tried to explain how math can actually work with infinity. They insisted I was lying.

    A part of me thought they were just trying to troll me, but after seeing and interacting with them multiple times afterwards, I’m pretty sure those were their genuine beliefs. They were also a moon landing denier, but after the whole math discussion I didn’t touch that topic with a ten foot pole.

      • aMockTie@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I now consider it one of many examples of the idea that you can’t use reason and evidence to change someone’s beliefs, if they never used reason or evidence to conclude those beliefs in the first place.

        I feel sorry for those who have never felt the excitement of changing their beliefs based on new evidence or understanding, especially when due to their own hubris. Being wrong is an opportunity to learn and discover. Everyone who has ever lived, and will ever live, is sometimes wrong.

        In a way, that’s the general theme of this thread. We stood our ground when we knew we were right and could prove it with reason and evidence, while facing opposition that was based on stubbornness, hubris, and refusal to admit to being wrong.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I feel sorry for those who have never felt the excitement of changing their beliefs based on new evidence or understanding, especially when due to their own hubris.

          Not only is it sad, nearly everything wrong with the world right now can be boiled down to a handful of people having this character flaw

  • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I have to be “that guy” sometimes when it comes to fire performance safety. There’s huge risks involved so there really isn’t a lot of wiggle room. I try to treat any fuckups as learning opportunities though, I don’t want to scare away the newbies

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yes, we had a tooling design and it was going to fail because the angles and mechanisms were not right. My boss overruled me, under protest, and we built it how the customer wanted it with no changes.

    It failed in production.

    There was a big meeting with everyone upset. I said I told you! And tried to reexplain why it doesnt work. They denied knowing about the issues previously.

    Thankfully the president stepped in and said, I was in the initial meeting and remember you warning of the potential failure. Then everyone shut up.

    We redid everything my way.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Sounds like an awesome president.

      I have the same story (with a huge failure at a metal factory) that I had a dozen times made a big scene about how terrible an idea it was. The corporate guy who suggested it decided to email god and country that if only (my team specifically of) engineering had supported us more it wouldn’t have happened like that. I was fuming, spent half the night furiously detailing and outlining my proof of how we supported him, bad idea, etc.

      I ended up drunkenly scrapping the entire write up and just reply alling “fuck you (name)”. Perhaps my proudest work moment, tbh.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I believe that GenAI is a scam that should’ve been treated and criminalized/prosecuted like one long before it got to the point of destructiveness that it’s currently at and I’ll die on that hill.

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        You want a scenario of ‘what if Theranos was actually successful and Elizabeth Holmes didn’t get busted?’ That’s GenAI in a nutshell.