carbrained bullshit from the guardian as usual. do they wanna cite statistics or even a source on “many motorists, however, resent the changes”? of course not, evidence-free bothsidesing of vehicular deaths it is

this is an amazing study in how to go carefully, point-by-point, through something, and refute none of it.

Existing relationship (boss) might not be leading with compersion 🙃

https://redsails.org/the-swerve/

in south africa they’ll murder racists like you for free 😉

0*2 is also 0 and maybe makes the joke better 🙃

“more diversity” includes people whose entire lives are politicized, so you have to pick between “more diversity” and “less politics”, you cannot have both

banning communists opens up space for fascism? whoever could have predicted! 🤯

fucking your neighbor’s pet cat is morally neutral

yeah this is turning out to be as wild as I expected

also already covered by rule #3

so you think all humans have rights to do any kinds of violent, invasive acts to any animal, as long as they call it a “veterinary procedure”? is there anything a human could do to an animal which you would classify as “rape”?

and getting a giant steel horn implanted in your forehead would be a cosmetic procedure, but i guess you’d be pretty upset if someone did it to you without asking?

artificial insemination would fit the legal definition of rape in several jurisdictions in the world if you did it to a human.

how do you think dairy cows are always pregnant if they’re not being forcibly impregnated 🤔🤔

if you eat or drink any dairy products then you have almost certainly paid a company to rape some animals for you.

yes but wtf is a niché (neesh-ay) as opposed to a niche?

more like a rest-of-the-worldly date format 🙃

any Firefox fork, while we wait for Servo to be ready

I think you might be 180° missing the point of the meme

“yeah, keep doing that and some useless fuck will spectacularly fail to assassinate you, giving a huge boost to your election campaign, take that!”