Because it isn’t a free software license. Software licensed by the MIT license can be copied and made into proprietary software. Since (I hope) we agree proprietary software should be minimised licensing under a free software license ensures big tech can’t make there own corporate software from it without ever giving back.

The consitution of the united states was written by a few rich, white, slave owners. And was written so they would be able to keep there wealth.

Kalmala is a rich zionist with an insentive to maintain the status quoe. Even if she wanted to change things she still has to bow down to her rich doners and the press both of which dont want her to do anything that threatens them.

There is no way to fix a system designed to uphold the rich and segregate minorities.

The alternative that actually works is revolution.

The thing about correct theories is they are right every time.

Oh that’s hilarious!

I don’t get the context, I don’t follow Chinese politics.

I get scared by cold storage since you never know when it dies. After 20 years and finding that thing you wanted who knows if it’s kicked the bucket by then?

But what if you forget? Why risk it when you don’t have to? There is no shame in not remembering and needing to write it down. If you always remember than that’s good for you but a lot of people don’t.

Why don’t you think the MIT license is bad?

Why would you? You won’t be able to replicate the custom hardware, drivers and software. Why not just build an sff pc?

Headscale is great but requires port forwarding which, aside from having its own iasues, is something op wants to avoid.

Cheap domains are basically free though so it doesn’t count!

Ive also heard of “survival capitalism”

That’s a nice argument, why don’t you back it up with a source?

Why is there this idea that personal property such as phones are specific to capitalism? Why does making or reading memes have anything to do with enjoying capitalism? Other social orders also allow for making memes and using phones.

Although I do agree most people don’t benefit from capitalism, only the top 1% do so yeah the meme doesn’t really make sense in that respect.

I’ve never heard or thought about bells it sounds like they would be pretty effective.

After some research, which is hard to do with most websites trying to tell you there shitty product will stop hunting better than everyone else’s. It looks like there aren’t any studies that say bells reduce hunting more than 50%. Most cats just find ways around jiggling the bell or they just don’t walk and wait for a bird to come within pouncing range.

You can keep your cat however you want but I wouldn’t be sure they aren’t killing any birds, or noninvasive mammals or reptiles.

Do you let your cat roam free? How many birds is letting your cat outside worth? cats are responsible for the majority of bird deaths in the united states.

100%. All cats eat birds and are a danger to wildlife. They should never be let outside to roam freely.

I hate it when people say shit like “tibbles wouldnt hurt a fly” all cats have natural (very effective) hunting instincts, unless they have some disability, it will probably kill if let outside.

In australia feral cats are causing native animals to go extinct.

We just need to find this guy and everything will be perfect?

These libs are such zionists, even if you hate russia you have to recognise the contradiction with banning russia but not israel.

Why do ppl never go outside