I guess that’s why

So true marxism restored my hope in humanity.

People have definitely noticed that with movies. But music streaming is pretty good with having 99% of what most people need and songs don’t just dissapear nearly as often, we’ll see how that changes though.

Why do you need to make humanoid robots? Just make application specific robots that don’t look like humans it’s way easier.

Or even better just pay real humans.

Music piracy will come make a comeback eventually. Its already coming back with movies.

Paying for music is in a blip of being better than piracy for most people and the “morally correct” argument is very dominent right now.

But the contradiction between consumers wanting cheap convinient music and streaming cites wanting as much money as possible can’t last like this forever.

It still is here!

I’d add to that with modern mirrorless cameras have amazing fast autofocus and can focus while taking a shot.

I do some photography myself and I am an amature but taking a well focused image of a small bird in flight feels boarderline impossible.

How can you possibly capture a bug flying in mid air? Thats amazing

Wait you must have known what dialectical materialism was to give such a precise explanation of it.

Also I probably framed my question poorly, meant to ask how dialectical materialism was going to change in order to account for quantum physics. My thinking is that dialectical materialism states that nothing is by definition unknowable but quantum physics states that some things are fundamentally unknowable.

Oh well this is shitty ask lemmy anyway

Wait I think that’s what I meant to ask, dang it you’ve made me confused now!

The straw manning in this thread is amazing.

Linus allowing AI? This means the linux kernal will be flooded with unverified slop!

with that, they can do the open-source thing and fork it.

Ok regardless of your opinion on AI this is just stupid. No one is forking and maintaining the entire linux kernal.

In the absence of drugs, theirs always installing arch linux.

Guys this is shitty ask lemmy why is everyone answering with real answers.

I think it’s time we pass the batton to rome, they haven’t had the oppotunity in millenia.

Fuck cars is pretty cool though.

I see what you did there.

🏴‍☠️

I suppose so, but in that case either red or yellow is a primary colour not both. And since we are viewing this on an addative screen red is the primary colour.

Yellow isn’t a primary colour.

The current GNU coreutils have been C for decades, and I am not aware of an instance where this was a limiting factor. The GNU coreutils can still be bundled with proprietary software. Just like some Linux distributions used to come bundled with proprietary Nvidia drivers.

Can you possibly find an example where the Licensing the rust coreutils under the GPL would be an issue? Or actually any example at all of where using the GPL is a bad thing?

MIT License isn’t giving up Open Source, as all Open Source projects with MIT prove it.

I literally just described an example of it giving up open source. Any project under the MIT (https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Expat) license can become proprietary at any time and all development is no longer open source! How is my example of apple using FreeBSD without contributing not an example of giving up open source? If you would like I can find more examples. So far you havn’t given me any for your own evidence but I would like some so I can understand your argument better.

Also applogies for the late replies, I hope you don’t mind too much.