“Нас чекає важкий період, але Україна не програє” - Кирило Буданов в інтерв'ю ВВС - BBC News Україна
www.bbc.com
Кирило Буданов - найпублічніший керівник воєнної розвідки не тільки в історії України, а й в масштабах всього світу. Його прогнози вже не такі оптимістичні, але, як стверджує він, Україна не програє у цій війні.

Just for the context GUR is Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Agency. Practically like the CIA is in the US.

The relevant part, translated:

BBC: You recently spoke about Telegram being a problem for Ukraine.

Kyrylo Budanov: I can repeat that again for you. It is a huge problem.

BBC: And what can be done about it?

Kyrylo Budanov: Or, as they say, to put it in order - at least legally force everyone to register, so it is clear who is behind which media resource, and Telegram has already definitely acquired the status of media. There is no question of influence or pressure - the issue is not about that. If you want to promote your position - and it may not please someone and that is normal in a democratic society - take responsibility. What are you afraid to say who you are?

BBC: So you’re talking about anonymous Telegram channels?

Kyrylo Budanov: They are all anonymous. Do you know a single Telegram channel that openly said I am this person? That’s the answer.

BBC: Could their closure become a solution to this problem? Blocking?

Kyrylo Budanov: Temporarily yes, but I still believe they need to be forced to register. This will not be pressure on the press. In a democratic society, I say again, you cannot simply exert pressure…

Why am I even telling you this? You are a media representative. Would you be very happy if someone came to you and said: that’s it, from now on you write like this? Of course, that would be abnormal. But being afraid to say who you are is also wrong. And throwing anything into the ether on behalf of an anonymous person, excuse me, paid from completely different parts of the world is also abnormal.

“We’re not pressuring them, we are merely holding them accountable”

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    405·
    6 months ago

    Homie needs to stfu and realize that he’s the middleman in a proxy war and stop saying stupid shit in public that could damage his ability to do his job.

    And it’s incredibly stupid shit.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        510·
        6 months ago

        Ukrainian self determination ended with CIA coup in 2013. Ukraine was no longer a sovereign state from that point when Yanukovich, the democratically elected president, was forced to flee his country. CIA’s coup in 2003 failed and Ukraine was still sovereign until 2013.

        Honestly, you should be scared that Zelensky has said twice that he wants Ukraine to be the new Israel, and begged for WW3 last year.

          • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
            49·
            6 months ago

            So democracy is now worse than US coup dictatorship? Decide if you want to call Ukraine sovereign or not. US puppet means Ukraine is not sovereign.

              • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
                35·
                6 months ago

                Ukrainians made their own choice in 2014. There was no US “coup”.

                Ever heard the leaked call between Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt? Or is that leaked call Russian propaganda too?

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    291·
    6 months ago

    Yea Ukrainian government does want to make it a censored state. Good luck with that and joining the EU with such positions lol

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        164·
        6 months ago

        In Ukraine they have real bad censorship ideas and I’m against censorship of any form. What I’m the most worried about is the fact that one of the military related ministers (or maybe ex ministers I don’t remember) has the highest chance of becoming the next president (at least the last time I saw the stats). That’s a straight way to dictatorship and also the government tries their best to make the people truly aggressive to Russians (no matter who they are) and even kinda fascistic is general. There’s nothing good about it, even in the current situation. And at the same time they’re accusing Russia in doing the same (which is true but doesn’t justify Ukraine) lol

          • moreeni@lemm.eeOP
            52·
            6 months ago

            We had that type of bullshitery here way long before the war started. Also, the invasion doesn’t stop the corrupt government from stealing millions of hryvnas.

              • moreeni@lemm.eeOP
                51·
                6 months ago

                Stealing food is on whole other level and ai’m not sure whether comparison Gaza to Ukraine is correct. I can only speak about my country, and the fact is the mass censorship and bullshittery were NOT caused by the external agressor and thus getting rid of them will NOT help the fundamental issues here.

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    231·
    6 months ago

    If you want to promote your position - and it may not please someone and that is normal in a democratic society - take responsibility. What are you afraid to say who you are?

    While I understand the problems the propaganda machines of Russia and China (among other) causes, this here is some stupid shit

    Try to criticize Putin openly while living in Russia, speak up for the freedom to love and have sex with whoever you want in Uganda or publish pictures of Muhammad as a dog and sign all of it with your name and see what will happen.

    Anonymity is a double edged sword. While being “nice to have” in a democracy it’s a “must have” in a dictatorship.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      23·
      6 months ago

      I think a lot of people might be sympathetic to the idea that in wartime, you need to be stricter because of the incredibly high stakes. That Ukraine is at war, so they need to find and deal with these sources of disinformation.

      I think those same people need to realize that the policies never get rolled back to a more liberal state when the war is over.

      It sucks that this is a systemic advantage for authoritarians. It really sucks. It feels bad. But it’s the handicap you have to accept to resist authoritarianism.

    • trebuchet@lemmy.ml
      9·
      6 months ago

      People always complain on Lemmy about Telegram and point at alternatives that are theoretically better in terms of security and privacy.

      Yet the security and privacy on Lemmy are good enough that you routinely see governments complaining about how they can’t get at the info on Telegram like this story here, all while Telegram has a UI and experience that blows every competing messenger completely away.

    • potemkinhr@lemmy.ml
      101·
      6 months ago

      To be frank I have used it since it started way back and it continues to have the best user experience among messengers. I myself don’t use it for any crucial information but as a messenger with it’s featureset it’s second to none. When a better alternative pops up which will have a better UI and such an extensive featureset I will probably switch over

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      8·
      6 months ago

      • Excellent UI (WhatsApp keeps copying them, but they’re still ahead)

      • Open-source client

      • Good support for bots (very useful for group mods)