lol probably

and inevitably finding out

yeah here’s an archive https://archive.ph/a6Tmo

There are microkernels like minix and they work well, but that’s a different animal because user space is where you actually do make changes much more commonly than in the kernel. Also, I don’t really follow your argument regarding flatpack, it’s like you’re implying that containerized apps couldn’t exist without using machine-id for some reason?

I’ve already explained repeatedly how systemd goes against core Unix philosophy. Communities can form around all kinds of things, just because a community forms around bad idea that doesn’t mean it should be automatically accepted. Linux did get modular design largely right, that’s the whole problem here. Systemd throws the baby out with the bath water. Monolithic design was basically more convenient for companies trying to monetize the platform.

Systemd has gotten plenty of backlash as well, I’m certainly not the only person who sees the problems with it. The problem is that it’ll keep getting pushed by commercial interests. And the same thing will happen with AI incidentally.

pretty good overview here https://www.thomasfazi.com/p/the-ukraine-wars-big-lie

The difference is that the US completely dominated Vietnam in terms of technology and firepower. They razed the whole country to the ground, and poisoned much of the land there. People are still born with birth defects today thanks to the atrocities the US committed against Vietnam. The US was defeated in the end, but it came at a huge cost for the Vietnamese.

The key difference is that Iran has the technology to hit the US in the rear. Iran can attack bases, airfields, radars, and so on. The US has no safe staging area against Iran. So, I don’t think the type of war the US ran against Vietnam is even possible here.

On top of that, Iran has the US by the balls economically because they control traffic through Hormuz. Trump already blurted out how they only have 4 weeks of oil left.

I’d argue that Iran is fundamentally different from every other war the US has waged since WW2 because it’s the first time the US decided to directly take on an opponent that can match them technologically. What happened here is that technology has advanced past the point where US military doctrine makes sense. It simply doesn’t account for stuff like cheap drones, or IR based AA systems which Iran has. Iran also has access to Russian and Chinese satellite data and advanced missiles that US is unable to intercept. On top of that, Iran is fighting on their home turf while the US has a logistics nightmare of ferrying weapons, troops, and other supplies across the ocean.

And what makes this war different is the fact that the US was actually visibly defeated in head to head combat. It’s not like Vietnam or Afghanistan where they razed the country to the ground and abused these people for years on end until they got bored and left. This time around, Iran was able to respond decisively with their own weapons and destroy US based, aircraft, it was able to track down and attack US troops hiding in hotels across the Gulf states. This has simply never happened before.

Protocols were understood well enough that you could build a single app that could communicate across different platform. That’s basically not feasible today.

totally not a bubble

I just can’t understand why people keep trying to white wash this guy.

In certain conditions that’s true.

imagine being this detached from reality y’all

Looks like Iran need to keep teaching the burger reich that it can’t fuck around without consequences.

The lack of interoperability between modern chat apps is a real tragedy. I remember the days when you could have a single messenger app of your choice and talk to people across different networks instead of having to juggle a whole bunch of apps like you do today. Really shows why open protocols are so important.

I would imagine that hydro would actually have to deal with more friction leading to more energy loss.

Yeah for sure.

The fact that it has been around since 2011 and still suffers from UI problems and other bugs really highlights the problem with your arguments. You also very clearly have no idea how software development actually works if you think that code written manually by a human is inherently more reliable. Humans make mistakes all the time that’s why we have software bugs in the first place. The way we ensure that code works is by having things like tests, specifications, and code reviews. All of these same tools work just as well with LLM generated code as they do with code written by hand.

Energy density has nothing to do with this. It’s the cost of how much pollution refining the rare earths and making batteries produces vs the amount of pollution associated with construction of a building with pulleys that move weights up and down.

What I meant is that you need to build a unit of a certain size before it becomes efficient enough to be practical.