• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    How do you recover that? How the hell are they going to recover what is essentially multiple time the sum of the wealth of all the top 10 richest individuals on earth???

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I just hope the collapses won’t pull others with them and the whole construction sector. I think the fear of that and the effects rippling to other sectors and to trust in the economy is why bailing out is sometimes done.

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          yes, it’s a good reminder that capitalism doesn’t actually work and needs to be propped up with bailouts to ensure it doesn’t collapse and gets replaced.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well China is trying to not bail them out, at least for now. And some others have done it before too. It’s just people fear the risk of doing that, hoping that by bailing them out things won’t be as bad.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Except that the Chinese national government is trying to reign in the domestic construction market and export as much as it can.

          It was the right strategy to keep building for a generation, but it isn’t right strategy any more.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve read that they’re trying to lessen the share of the GDP but an uncontrolled crash would still be horrible. Hopefully whatever they do that is avoided.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              It is more than that. China significantly invested in infrastructure for a generation, which was generally good. However, China has hit a point where infrastructure investment won’t produce the returns it used to or any at all. China also needs to figure out a way to find municipal governments, which it hasn’t before. China also has to deal with a significant drop in economic growth, something it hasn’t dealt with for a generation.

              These are novel problems for the Chinese government.

    • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 months ago

      By locking up the rich, seizing their wealth, and using SOEs to take over incomplete projects for pennies.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      multiple time the sum of the wealth of all the top 10 richest individuals on earth???

      Do you mean the $78B fine or the $300B debt?

      In either case, you’re way over exaggerating. All of the top 14 wealthiest people have over $100B each. Jeff Bezos (#2 richest) has close to $200B alone.

      https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires

        • cbarrick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Right!?

          These people have more wealth than the GDP of some nations.

          Jeff Bezos has more wealth ($190B) than the GDP of Ukraine ($170B).

          • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            In theory, but if he tried to liquidate all of his Amazon stock at once it’s very unlikely he would get that much for it. The price of the stock would crash.

            • sibachian@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              except in theory they can borrow from the bank with their stock as leverage and would never actually need to liquidate anything (and they do just that).

              • cbarrick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yep. This fucking loophole in the American tax system.

                You borrow against your existing wealth, then the cost basis of your investments resets upon inheritance. So your estate can sell the investment to pay off the debt, and no capital gains tax is ever paid.

                Because of this, in America, capital gains tax only applies to the middle class. The rich have a clear and obvious loophole.