• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think its kind of dumb because the P-47 Thunderbolt was a high altitude interceptor/fighter that also happened to be good at ground pounding.

    The A-10 is exclusively a ground pounder that becomes a sitting duck if it ever gets caught with its pants down.

    Dunno why they copted a fighter name.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The whole reason why there isn’t a modern equivalent to the A-10 is because the Air Force knew that said plane wouldn’t be able to survive in a conflict where the enemy had any surface-to-air attack capability.