• 10 Posts
  • 242 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • Two lawyers got in a pissing contest on developing the land they owned.

    My great-grandfather apparently had a story about it. It involved lots of booze, a prostitute, and a horse. Then again most of his stories had the same theme so the truthfulness of the story is up for debate.

    Missoula is a bit odd on a few things. I attended Hellgate elementary - yes that’s the name of the school.



  • I went to a very small public university campus that a few years before was associated with a massive state university. They were still mostly independent but we’re getting all sorts of pressure to conform to the larger universities policies on research etc. At my school the professors all taught and did little to no research.

    As part of their ongoing arguments they had all juniors/seniors in both schools take a standardize tests at the end of their core degree courses for a year. My tiny university averaged 90th percentile. The large university averaged 30th percentile. The difference having highly qualified dedicated teachers.


  • Farmers are price-takers not price-makers. The prices they receive are driven by speculation on the commodities markets (even for crops not traded on the market).

    Since they can’t control the price they receive for their crop, they are very sensitive to any change in the cost of inputs. Determining how much to spent on inputs is the part of their profitablity they can control. So widespread behavioral change is usually pretty close to immediate.





  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzForbidden Fruit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Out-breeding depression primarily results in a decrease of fertility and infant mortality. So although it is occasionally observed in surviving offspring, in general it is much lower probability.

    Also the neandertal crossing was deleterious it would be much lower percentage in modern humans. It also would not have come from multiple crossing events.


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzForbidden Fruit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    29 days ago

    Usually these issues are caused by mitochondrial DNA not nuclear DNA. Mitochondrial DNA is only passed on from the female. So if there is an incompatibility, it’s usually completely lethal to any offspring.

    So a HMNF coupling could not have been possible because of the neanderthal’s female mitochondrial DNA.


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzForbidden Fruit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    If I had to guess the successful crosses were potentially much healthier than either parent line. Heterosis (hybrid vigor) would likely be pretty extreme in genetic lines that has been isolated by 300,000+ years of time. Of course the degree of fertility was likely lowered due to genetic distance. Once the initial cross was made however, back-crossing to either species by the hybrid would likely be much easier.

    Many of those ancient stories about individuals with super strength and size etc could have likely been based upon these crosses.

    The evidence is showing neadertals never truly died out. Their smaller population bred back into the modern humans who came later.


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzForbidden Fruit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    There is a few different potential reasons as well as sexual preference.

    Genetic incompatibility - the interspecific cross could only occur one way.

    Genetic bottlenecks in the neandertal lineage. A high inbred coefficient could have decreased the neandertal females overall fertility (high deleterious alleles load). This could also cause a rapid reduction in the percentage of neandertal DNA in a mixed population.

    Maternal behavior - Neandertals females might not have cared for hybrid offspring appropriately. This could be for anything from milk production requirements to differences in physiological developmental rates.


  • It’s normal to cite your own work if the new paper is a continuation of that research. A references or three is normal and expected.

    When somebody publishes a bullshit paper that is eventually withdrawn, every subsequent paper citing the fraudulent work can also be withdrawn as being unreliable.

    A sign it’s all bullshit is when you see the majority of the citations for the paper from the same author. This usually doesn’t pass peer review anymore. In hyperspecialized fields with few researchers, they commonly get a little creative on the introduction section to include other authors.


  • What usually happens is some nepo-baby manager gets into an argument with the critical experienced employee. The employee gets “downsized” and his job is outsourced to a 3rd party.

    Then they make it through a year without a major issue and the nepo-baby is promoted. 3 months later the completely avoidable catastrophe occurs and the nepo-baby claims “that didn’t happen on under my direction”. More scapegoats are laid-off or fired.






  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldDraw!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its a fucking stupid and manipulative question for the employer to ask. No employer should give a fuck if somebody took a couple years to travel, take care of family, or just couldn’t find a job.

    What they are really asking "Are any of the time gaps in your job history, a job that you got fired from with cause? "

    Instead of being little shits about it just ask the actual question straight out. The shock value of asking a real non-bullshit questions in an interview has paid off many times for me when hiring.