• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There’s a real dark irony in a book about a young boy quite literally coming out of the closet to discover his true self written by a woman who might as well be a Dursley.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      The irony disappears slightly when the whole slave liberation arc was literally Confederate propaganda that was so distasteful and irrelevant to the plot, it was cut from the movies.

      The house elves love being slaves. It’s the natural order of things.

    • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The real dark irony is Jo saying they probably would have transitioned when they were younger if they were aware of gender expression.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Harry Potter has no true self to discover. From the first to the last page of this pile of rags he is a wizarding Mary Sue with near-infinite privilege and the personality of an oyster. The story opens with “yer a wizard” in the first 50 pages and that’s the end of his character arc. From then on he’s a mere vessel for the reader to experience the world and the author to move the plot along.

      … As a matter of fact, what even is the biggest character arc in that story? I don’t remember much, but Neville and Hermione have a glowup and Harry’s uncle dies or something? And the weasleys open a shop? I certainly don’t recall anything that lends credence to the idea that Rowling even believes that either individual people or societies are capable of profound change. The story begins and ends basically in the exact same place except the characters are 10ish years older.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        From the first to the last page of this pile of rags he is a wizarding Mary Sue with near-infinite privilege and the personality of an oyster.

        I disagree.

        As a matter of fact, what even is the biggest character arc in that story? I don’t remember much

        :-/

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            It’s a generic critique of any fantasy novel protagonist. Potter isn’t any more of a Mary Sue than Aragorn or Rand Al’Thor.

            And “The plot was bad, I don’t even remember what happened”. Bro, what do I even say to that?

            The story wasn’t so bad that it failed to sell tens of millions of copies in dozens of languages.

            • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 minutes ago

              Aragorn…you had all of literature to pick from and you chose Aragorn as your first example?

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 hour ago

              And “The plot was bad, I don’t even remember what happened”. Bro, what do I even say to that?

              The story wasn’t so bad that it failed to sell tens of millions of copies in dozens of languages.

              Thanks, i can respond to that. It may have not had the best written story, but it was a story that resonated with people (even though we, on reflection, found a lot to pick apart in it) and that’s really, really hard to do. Tens of millions of copies each volume indeed.

              From then on he’s a mere vessel for the reader to experience the world and the author to move the plot along.

              I mean i’m exposing my writing naivete here but if we get rid of the word mere above, isn’t the primary job of the MC to be a vessel for the reader to experience the world and the author to move the plot? we kind of come back to the same idea. give a bland protag that the reader can feed their emotions and reasoning into and they connect a little more. the more they connect the better the book sells. it seems like a decent writing strategy if nothing else is working.

              given that thought, maybe i should write a novel about me. i can’t think of anything blander. maybe that’s why they say everyone’s first novel is about themselves.

            • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I’d argue Harry is way worse than both Aragorn and Rand Al’Thor. At least there’s several attributes added to both of those characters, though Aragorn is a lot more fleshed out. Aragorn is noble, loyal, carries a deep sadness, love towards someone special, etc., you can easily describe him with other words than just “adult man who becomes king”. Rand struggles with what he should do, who he is, what will he become, who should he love? all that, he too can be described with not only surface level things.

              What qualities does Harry have? He hates people who are terrible? Feels sad when he loses people he cares about? He has no feelings outside of generic things he does in his life, it’s like he’s on autopilot and just reacts to things like some standard of a person would. How would you describe his traits, other than some generic “a kid that becomes a special wizard and grows up” or his physical appearance? And I don’t think Rand Al’Thor is a very good character mind you, but at least he is one. Harry is just an empty shell

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 minutes ago

                I’d argue Harry is way worse than both Aragorn and Rand Al’Thor.

                That’s fine. You’re entitled to your own opinion.

                What qualities does Harry have?

                Naivete, isolation, and confusion that gives way to optimism and comradrie in Book 1. If you ever read any Roald Dahl novels, he’s got much of the same youthful curiosity and compassionate cheerfulness of James from the Giant Peach and Charlie from the Chocolate Factory.

                Much of Harry’s early personality is informed by his struggle to understand his parents and his parents’ friends, picking up and discarding their habits and traits in pursuit of self-actualization (Book 3/4/5, in particular, have him latching onto Remus Lupin and then Sirius Black as idols, only to lose them and himself in turn). Over the course of the series Harry’s initial optimism is poisoned by cynicism and hatred, frustration at the failure of his elder peers, and ultimately a depressive death spiral. He matures, discarding the childish qualities of the early books and adopts more mature (often toxic and reactionary) views and motivations by the end of the series. As a case in point, Book 1 Harry would have happily joined SPEW, while Book 5 Harry considers it an annoyance. I’d say Harry’s arc really peaks in Book 6, when he uses black magic on Draco Malfoy and Snape has to rush in to save him. He’s gone from a cheerful, generous, naive little kid to a battle-hardened child soldier.

                Like, if I was to really describe Harry’s story progression, that’s it. Its a look inside a child that’s forced to fight a war for survival. You get a similar (abet much better written) character trajectory for the Animorphs. But to say nothing is going on with the central character? That’s blatantly rage-bait.

                Also my suspicion that book 6 is the last book that Rowling had more than a few token notes on. By book 7, you can really feel the ghostwriters crowding in and WB taking a heavy hand in editing/finalizing (although it’s clear they’ve been around since book 4). Forcing a Disney-style happy ending on a wizard civil war betrayed so much of what Rowling had set up in the early novels.

                • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 minutes ago

                  Well that is a good analysis! You honestly got me more convinced of Harry’s personhood than the books ever did. I guess I just really, really hate Harry as a protagonist, which blinds me to the other points. I’ll blame Rowlings writing style for that one though.

                  And yes, I fully agree about the later books; after the fifth one, I can barely remember anything that happens in them, outside some biggest plot points. Compared to how I can still fairly well recall what happens in books 1-4, and mostly 5 as well despite there being more time passed after reading them, the contrast is huge.

    • GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      18 hours ago

      At least it’s not more explicit. It’s not like there’s some potion that lets you change your physical appearance at will that is even capable of turning you into a furry. Or a type of witch/wizard whose special ability is to change their appearance at will, as shown by a slightly androgynous woman who regularly changes her appearance based on how she’s feeling in the moment.

  • hoch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    As much as the author sucks, I enjoy the series too much to throw it away :/

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      33 minutes ago

      YAaaarrr, we be enjoying content from slimey, bilge-bucket creators without spending a single doubloon on their barnacle-covered arses. 🏴‍☠️

    • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      Whenever you spend any money on anything Harry Potter related, offset it by giving at least that much to a charity for LGBTQ+.

    • nikki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      20 hours ago

      pirate the media and dont give it exposure then :) any dollar given to that franchise is a dollar spent to harm trans people

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It harms much more than just trans people. Firstly transphobes think even the slightest form of gender-noncomformity is transgenderism, secondly many of those TERF orgs also oppose other things (wondering if Collective Shout got any money from her, but probably she already blames porn for trans people).

        • UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          transgenderism

          Forgive me if I’ve been mislead, but from what I understand “transgenderism” is a term used by transphobes to diminish a legitimate phenomenon, implying it is a belief or fad.

          Still upvoted for contributing to the discussion and for supporting an alien in his search for the universe’s best cup of coffee.

          • BanMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            I always hear “transgender ideology” from transphobes, to make it more of a thought exercise and fad than a physical state of being. “Transgenderism” is a word I’ve been familiar with for decades but it may have been coopted or is being eschewed now, not sure.

    • Another Catgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      18 hours ago

      as a transfem academic who enjoyed HPMoR, I dislike JKR’s Harry Potter series because it’s poorly written and is not critical enough of the ethical problems it contains

      • Baggie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Oh you mean the fascistic nightmare world where it turns out the only problem is bad actors, not the fact that it’s systemically rotten to the core?

        Motherfucker becomes a cop ffs

        • Another Catgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I mean, both worlds are rotten to the core, it’s just that HPMoR is properly critical of the problems therein. Only one of the two worlds has the main character working hard to dismantle the institutional racism he was presented with.

    • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      outside of nostalgia which is hard to quantify what is the appeal compared to thousands of better series in the genre? Its not just written by a bigoted monster who uses her platform for harming others its filled with lackluster world building and empty characters.

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Now we’re talking!

        I’m first:

        Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, by Fritz Leiber.

        Very 1980-ish fantasy for adults.

        Your turn!

      • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Are you assuming that there aren’t trans people that like Harry Potter? Do YOU have any trans people in your life?

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I didn’t assume anything, I just asked a question.

          I do have a handful of trans people in my life, yes.

  • MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Here’s an honest question. Are we allowed to buy Harry Potter stuff after JKR is dead, since she won’t get paychecks from it anymore?

    I don’t but it now, think I missed the hype train by being too old when it hit it’s hype.

    But the biggest issue is JKR getting the money not the franchise? Or am I missing something where the franchise and license owners are also anti-trans?

    I can’t keep up with everything, but I know Harry Potter is getting a lot of hate and I’m out of the loop besides JKR just being a cunt on social media.

    • GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If she owns the rights she could theoretically put something in her will that states x% of proceeds from her intellectual properties will go to [insert TERF organization here]. Considering she’s made it her life goal to make society as inaccessible to trans people as possible, I assume she’ll make sure she can do so in death as well.

      • MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        So she’s well beyond just commenting and is funding things that hurt the trans community?

        I should Google more.

        • DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yup. Just one of her purchases put about 70,000 pounds Stirling in the hands of the lawyers that got gender recognition certificates rendered moot in the UK supreme court. Thats the landmark ruling that has since allowed bathroom, locker room , gym and sport single sex policing completely legitimate by UK authorities and forced “transgender row” in prisons to send trans prisoners to institutions of their birth sex.

          She does a lot more with her money than that but that was her single biggest win so far.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Funny you mention it, because I was thinking of going back and reading all the Dilbert strips I missed out on after Scott Adams went mask-off racist. Am I allowed?

      (edit: LOL, looks like a moot point, I tried going there just now and the server doesn’t seem to be running)

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Nobody is stopping you but be warned 90% of Dilbert is utter crap, might be entertaining to a child, some weird child who works in a cubicle or something.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I mean… You’re allowed to buy it now, whether or not you choose to do so