• Gonzako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Nah, I’d like to un-see recursion. It was way overblown on uni, I barely ever use it.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Recursion is amazing for a small selection of problems. Most of the time you don’t need, or want, it. When it is useful though, it tends to be really useful.

          I don’t understand people’s issue with it. I always found it easy. Maybe that’s why I feel this way. Maybe if you find it challenging you want to avoid it, even when it’s a good solution.

          • kamstrup@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Most devs I know like recursion. Trouble is that many popular languages don’t support tail recursion, but throw a stackoverflow error after a few thousand levels. So you have to keep track of max recursion depth manually, and it starts to look like a complicated solution

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I think, their point (and also my experience) is that you get taught about it in university a lot more than about simple loops, so it feels more important even though you rarely use it in reality.

            Same thing goes for linked lists and inheritance…

          • kamstrup@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Most devs I know like recursion. Trouble is that many popular languages don’t support tail recursion, but throw a stackoverflow error after a few thousand levels. So you have to keep track of max recursion depth manually, and it starts to look like a complicated solution