• Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Nah, I’d like to un-see recursion. It was way overblown on uni, I barely ever use it.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Recursion is amazing for a small selection of problems. Most of the time you don’t need, or want, it. When it is useful though, it tends to be really useful.

        I don’t understand people’s issue with it. I always found it easy. Maybe that’s why I feel this way. Maybe if you find it challenging you want to avoid it, even when it’s a good solution.

        • kamstrup@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Most devs I know like recursion. Trouble is that many popular languages don’t support tail recursion, but throw a stackoverflow error after a few thousand levels. So you have to keep track of max recursion depth manually, and it starts to look like a complicated solution

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I think, their point (and also my experience) is that you get taught about it in university a lot more than about simple loops, so it feels more important even though you rarely use it in reality.

          Same thing goes for linked lists and inheritance…

        • kamstrup@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Most devs I know like recursion. Trouble is that many popular languages don’t support tail recursion, but throw a stackoverflow error after a few thousand levels. So you have to keep track of max recursion depth manually, and it starts to look like a complicated solution