• ryan@the.coolest.zone
    54·
    1 year ago

    At my old job we had a system of first initial + last name, or if that was already taken then the first two characters of first name + last name, etc. A ticket came into us from an Lo[…] Li who had some concerns about being loli@bignamecompany.com. We obviously gave him an alias.

  • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.mlEnglish
    48·
    1 year ago

    You can tell it’s fake based on the fact the signatures don’t have 3 images shilling whatever internal feel-good initiative upper management is shilling this month. Those are great for email 2 ticketing systems … sigh.

    I hate my life.

  • just2043@lemm.eeEnglish
    23·
    1 year ago

    Always think of Shawna Hart for the first initial last name type of aliases.

    • Dandroid@dandroid.app
      6·
      1 year ago

      I used to own the Xbox account KevinShart. I haven’t logged into it in like 10 years though, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they deleted the account.

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    23·
    1 year ago

    Used to work on an AS400 inventory system. First 5 letters of your last name+ first letter of your first name. New hire named Sean Moroney ended up with “morons” as his handle and they wouldn’t change it. Felt so bad for the dude lol

  • Christian@lemmy.mlEnglish
    18·
    1 year ago

    I saw one of these in action! I never actually knew her, but she was cc’ed in a lot of the emails I was getting. Our emails were first initial, middle initial, first three letters of last name, then extra digits if needed. J. E. Lloyd had “jello@…”

  • Turious@leaf.danceEnglish
    18·
    1 year ago

    I fairly regularly work with someone who, in their organization’s alias scheme, was given the email address of an 80s cartoon villain. It rules so much and I doubt she’s even in on the joke.

  • Bankenstein@feddit.de
    15·
    1 year ago

    Back in the day when a lot of things things were capped at 8 characters, my uncle used to work for a company where they had (first 7 letters of last name) + (first letter of first name).

    At least until they hired a woman named Margaret Manspera. Luckily, mansperm@company.com was spotted in advance, and she was given margaret@company.com instead.

  • Chahk@beehaw.orgEnglish
    15·
    1 year ago

    First letter of first name + last name @ company dot com. They made an exception for Wendy Horowitz.

  • bobbytables@feddit.de
    15·
    1 year ago

    One of the systems we currently use at work just shortens the first name to 1-4 characters and adds the last name. I still have to figure out on what criteria.

    The bad thing about it is that it sometimes changes names to the other gender - think Erica to Eric. I never realized how often that could be done in my language by chance and it only affects female names.

    Normally that would matter much but three weeks ago they established that account name as our new matrix chat handles…

  • MJBrune@beehaw.orgEnglish
    143·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, IT should just really ask “What do you want your email address to be?” and not auto-assign. Just give IT a general alias so that your chat name, email address, source control account, or any other account, can all be the same. The issue is that some people are going to want the same exact alias and then that creates a back and forth but at bigger places, IT should be able to cut out some time to make a system to check if a username is taken and just send that to new hires. For smaller places, collisions like that are less likely to happen.

      • MJBrune@beehaw.org
        201·
        1 year ago

        You’ve not worked in large companies then because people end up having the same first and last names as each other. Collision with names is literally unavoidable in large companies. Also for people who don’t have a single last name, it can get confusing. Do you do First.Last.Last@company or just tell them to pick a favorite last name? (Which is potentially difficult for some people for personal reasons.) Honestly, just give people a chance to tell you what they want to be called, and this all smooths over.

        • CrayonMaster@midwest.socialEnglish
          10·
          1 year ago

          I mean yeah, but it happens even more with the naming scheme in the original post. Most companies just add a number when that happens. Predictable naming schemes, at least as the default, make it a lot easier to find people in large companies.

          • MJBrune@beehaw.orgEnglish
            51·
            1 year ago

            Predictable naming schemes, at least as the default, make it a lot easier to find people in large companies.

            Do they? I feel like most people use Gmail or Exchange and they don’t search by email address but instead by name. Which is a special field that shows the display name of the email address. So you’ll typically see “First Last first.last@somecompany.com” This is how I typically search the contact list since most of the time the C-level team are all like “tom@somecompany.com” instead of a last name included. Even when I was at T-Mobile and Comcast they had C-level people get to choose if they wanted just their first name.

            So overall my suggestion would equalize the company and allow for people to feel better about what they get to be called. At least, that’s the intent.

            You could alternatively try to enforce the email address format with everyone throughout the company but realistically that never happens. Someone always gets an exception because they are the CEO or pretty much retired but not wanting to learn the new way or whatever. Just letting people be called what they want seems to be the most human-solvable solution.

            • CrayonMaster@midwest.socialEnglish
              3·
              1 year ago

              Sorry, I meant professional company emails. Obviously people can make up whatever private gmail account they want. And people can state their preferred name, but the fact that if I call my coworker “Josh” and their last name is “Jacobson”, the fact that I can type in Josh.Jacobson and find them is extremely helpful, and I don’t get why companies would complicate that by making it “jojacko” .

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        4·
        1 year ago

        Because 30 years ago we didn’t have enough letters or something and people stick with tradition because change is apparently really hard to do.

  • Uprise42@kbin.social
    10·
    1 year ago

    We’ve had a couple funny ones where I work. I provision users in our call centers phone system.

    afriend@company.com is the most innocent one I’ve come across. Emails are only internal for us so no one really says anything since customers don’t see them

  • quicken@aussie.zone
    5·
    1 year ago

    I used to work with a dflowers@company and told him it was the best email address. He didn’t get the joke. 😥

    But then there was also a guy called Richard Face…