Suspected Israeli warplanes bombed Iran’s embassy in Syria on Monday, a marked escalation in a war pitting Israel against its regional adversaries, and Tehran said the strike killed seven military advisers including three senior commanders.
Reuters reporters at the site in the Mezzeh district of Damascus saw emergency workers clambering atop rubble of a destroyed building inside the diplomatic compound, adjacent to the main embassy building. Emergency vehicles were parked outside. An Iranian flag hung from a pole by the debris.
Okay, isn’t bombing an embassy an absolutely insane escalation? Even throughout WW1, WW2, or any other war in the past century, no country was crazy enough to undermine the sanctity of diplomacy like this and antagonize everyone.
The only other time this has happened in history was when NATO bombed a Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999, and even here the US — the most war-mongering nation on the planet — apologized, said it was a mistake (though it definitely wasn’t — it was removed from the list of prohibited targets beforehand and struck 3 separate times), and paid for it to be rebuilt. Israel is completely unhinged.
Yes. This is generally agreed upon as being a terminal escalation.
Attacking diplomatic missions very quickly turns into no diplomacy between the two countries. This doesn’t leave many options other than military actions on the table.
Do you think there’s much daily diplomacy between Israel and Iran/Syria?
They’re basically telling Iran to wage war on israel…
Okay, isn’t bombing an embassy an absolutely insane escalation?
Yep. There’s literally two countries in the world who could get away with it without causing a major diplomatic crisis if not downright war: Israel and the US.
Meh, I bet if Russia bomb some random embassies in Ukraine there would not be additional war.
Yeah, the “not already at war” part was implied lol
Or anyone else everyone is basically already at war with. E.g. if Ukraine were to destroy the Russian embassy in North Korea, nothing would escalate past where it already is.
The US has commissioned entire offices devoted to ensuring striking an embassy doesn’t happen again. Millions are spent every year to update the (surprisingly ever-changing) locations of embassies around the world so they don’t make the same mistake in the future. Whatever the thought process was that “allowed” a strike then has been eliminated and then some.
Little nuance here, Syria and Iran don’t get along, and Israel doesn’t have any particular problem with Syria, they have a problem with a nominally Syrian area controlled by an Iranian backed militia. Syria will do nothing, probably thinks this is funny. Iran might.
Iran and Syria are extremely close partners despite some ideological differences, and “israel” has consistently supported ISIS and other terrorist groups against the Syrian government (Israel’s Intelligence Chief, Herzi Halevy: “We will do everything to make sure ISIS does not lose in Syria.”) so idk where you got these ideas from.
Reading the papers for years. You seem to think the Israelis were supplying Hezbollah in Syria and Lebanon, instead of Iran.
Shit like this keeps happening and Iran just shows incredible amounts of restraint.
Meanwhile, the “only democracy in the Middle East” is allowed to act like a rabid dog.
I was about to wonder who was this delusional, when I realized Hexbear’s infection had showed up again.
Israel has nuclear weapons. Iran doesn’t. Israel can get away with strikes like this. Iran uses proxies to do similar but deny involvement. Their proxy Hezbollah has obviously been busy since October, and the commanders killed were involved with that. Or maybe it’s a response to October 7th. Iran themselves have claimed that October 7th was retaliation for the killing of Soleimani:
https://www.algemeiner.com/2023/12/27/iran-hamas-clash-motive-oct-7-massacre/
They have since retracted that statement and Hamas has always denied it, but yeah.
Obviously, bombing an embassy is bad, but it’s not as if they’re going to convince their detractors anyway, so why would they care about people who were going to hate them anyway hating them some more?
A bit like how Iran gets away with funding terrorists who target civilians, because anyone who hates Israel isn’t suddenly going to hate Israel any less because of it.
‘obviously bombing an embassy is bad but’
Yyyyyyyeeeeeaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh ok
That but really annoyed me lol.
As soon as you start using your embassy to move weapons around… yeaaaahhhhh
How the fuck do you use a building to move weapons? Is the embassy on rails?
Do you disagree that bombing an embassy is bad?
Did you like Israel before they bombed this embassy?
Stealing land is bad but
Killing civilians is bad but
Killing children is bad but
Starving civilians is bad but
Committing a genecide is bad but
Just add a but and everything is okej.
Oh, you want to pretend I said bombing an embassy is ok, so you can entertain yourself arguing against that.
“Convince their detractors” of what?
Why is the Israel government putting their entire nation even more at risk than it already is? What is the end game here as surely the people living in Israel recognize escalation puts them at risk.
They’re confident in their backing and feel invincible. Lebanon, a small coastal neighbor with sites from ancient judea. Expanding into the territory is probably on their timeline.
Israel is trying to create another six-day war. That’s why they are trying to escalate it to neighboring countries. It’s all a part of the Zionist land grab strategy. The current weakened state of Russia gives them an opportunity. Iran and Syria used to have a lot of military support from Russia. That may also be a reason for so much Israel receiving so much backing from the US.
So the west supports bombing brown children to take some pressure off of white children.
That makes sense, unfortunately.
Presumably, they want to drag USA into a broader regional war.
Its gonna be different when its not a people living in a concentration camp retaliating against Israel. This has the potential to escalate very quickly.
Don’t you think the entire point of Hamas’ attack was to escalate the conflict?
My friend’s grandparents escaped the bombing by a hair. The building in front of them got bombed, they are safe. His family is in process of bringing family members back from Syria.
😬
So they aren’t even going to say why they hit an embassy. Thats ballsy. Is this the last straw that starts the secret cogs turning to get rid of top leadership. If anytime to start it would be now to prevent further escalation.
They did it to try to broaden the conflict in hopes of drawing in direct military support from their western allies.
Ding ding ding
Correct
How does that actually benefit Israel, though? The “war” against Hamas at the moment is so lopsided in Israel’s favour that it seems ridiculous to even call it a war. A regional heavyweight like Iran could do some real damage, even if Israel’s supporters all show up. I’m not seeing the argument for “anger a country with a fucktonne of missiles in order to get help winning a war we were already easily winning”
With the public support amongst allies waning, Israel might be trying to escalate the war so as to once again gain favour.
Tomorrow if Iran or Jordan attacks Israel even if provoked by it, public support might change in its favour.
Right now Russia is tied up in Ukraine. For Israel, this is the perfect opportunity to get rid of Iran. Once the war in Ukraine ends, Israel will be in deep shit because Russia can provide support to Iran and other regional Israeli enemies. Furthermore, the Israeli economy has also been severely damaged by the emmigration that was triggered by the war. Their reputation as a Jewish safe haven is toast. Time is running out.
Bill Maher:What is your secret? Netanyahu:We have America
The dude they killed was involved in coördinating weapon transfers to and strikes by pro-Iranian militias on Israel. It’s weird they had so much restraint after Hamas’ escalation and Hezbollah’s support for it
It has ramped up those strikes in parallel with its campaign against Iran-backed Palestinian group Hamas, which ignited the Gaza war with an Oct. 7 attack on Israel that killed about 1,200 people and took 253 hostage, according to Israeli tallies.
No, Israel has had an active blockade on Gaza since 2007. A blockade is an act of war.
Israel has maintained effective control over Gaza since their military occupation ended almost 20 years ago, and they have really been making the Palestinians suffer.
Based on these considerations, some experts have found that “siege” better describes the situation.
However, the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights has said “the majority of international opinion” holds that Israel maintains effective control, even without armed forces present. While legal experts acknowledge that the lack of a military presence does not follow the “traditional approach” to analyzing effective control, they find that military presence is an “evidentiary test only.” They point to authorities such as the Israeli High Court, which have held that occupation status hinges on the exercise of effective control. They, therefore, find that technology has made it possible for Israel to use ongoing force to exercise effective control—imposing authority and preventing local authorities from exercising control—without a military presence.
Specifically, experts from the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory found “noting” positions held by the UN Security Council, UNGA, a 2014 declaration adopted by the Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention, the ICRC, and “positions of previous commissions of inquiry,” that Israel has “control exercised over, inter alia, [Gaza’s] airspace and territorial waters, land crossings at the borders, supply of civilian infrastructure, including water and electricity, and key governmental functions such as the management of the Palestinian population registry.” They also point to “other forms of force, such as military incursions and firing missiles.”
Even more detail. Thanks.
On the one hand, bombing someones embassy is a crime (and i expect nothing lesd from this regime), on the other hand, killing IRGC Generals is the best thing that Israel has done in a long time.
Edit: Apparently it isnt clear: The IRGC is a terrorist organization responsible for bombing kurds, murdering opposition leaders and massacres in Sistan and Baluchistan. Their skin color is completely irrelevant for me, i will always celebrate the deaths of people who harmed my extended family.
Yes, i am only endorse this because the generals werent white, not because the IRGC are systematically oppressing an entire country and have routinely bombed, tortured and murdered ethnic minorities in at home and abroad. Surely this is only motivated by racism.
Just a check, are all US embassies legit targets? I ask because the CIA is known to act out of them and the CIA is known for horrific acts that some might say generate terror.
Lmfao “opposition leaders”
Get fucked separatist cunts
