• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    So another snarl in the supply chain, on top of Iran’s and Ansar Allah’s restrictions on other sea traffic. Is that good? 🤔

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      afaik the usa is the sole loser if a supply chain disruption occurs in the canal. it affects countries doing trade with the us, but it’s not like chile can’t sell to any other country. or china.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Surely Europe relies on it too? It’s the connector between the Mediterranean and Red Seas, without it ships have to go around Africa.

        • egerlach@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I believe that you’re thinking of the Suez Canal. The Panama Canal allows ship traffic to go from the Atlantic to the Pacific without going around all of South America.

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          yeah, but my point is that it isolates the us from the world, not the world from the us. ewwrope could find a new economic partner if they werent us vassal states, the us doesnt have an option but for increased trade costs. it surely affects internatilnal market cos its all conected tho.