Brdsnest Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 hours ago

Trump told Ukraine it had no cards. Then Kyiv took the war to Russia

apnews.com

external-link
message-square
12
fedilink
18
external-link

Trump told Ukraine it had no cards. Then Kyiv took the war to Russia

apnews.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 hours ago
message-square
12
fedilink
U.S. President Donald Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last year that he had “no cards” in the fight against Russia. But since the meeting, Ukraine has shown it can take the war to Russia.
  • encelado748@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The opposite is also true. And it is part of the equation: you send cheap drones to force the use of expensive air defense. It is a war of economic attrition.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      52 minutes ago

      Right, and one side has a whole tot more to send

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Do provide citations to substantiate the claim that Russia is spending more on air defence than the west is on drones. Meanwhile, if you want to see actual economic war of attrition then go look at what Russian missiles are doing to infrastructure in Ukraine where there are no air defences. For example, around 70% of imports and exports went through Odessa which is now blockaded. And Ukrainian warehouses are being systematically eliminated. https://dengi.ua/en/business/9761324-russian-strikes-on-warehouses-how-the-war-is-reshaping-ukraine-s-logistics

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        $50k for long range drone vs $2M for missile defense. So it’s $1m to attack vs $2M to defend.

        https://defence-blog.com/cheap-drones-are-beating-russias-billion-dollar-air-defenses/

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          In practice Russia uses Pantsir https://odin.t2com.army.mil/WEG/Asset/96K6_Pantsir-S1_(SA-22_Greyhound)_Russian_Short-Range_Air_Defense_Gun::Missile_System which has point defences rather than just using missiles. Russia has also developed Yolka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yolka_(drone_interceptor) interceptor drones. Also, cost of production in Russia is far lower than it is in the west. What you’re reading in your link is projection, their analysis is based on what’s happening to yanks in the war on Iran. Anybody who thinks Russia uses S300/400 or Buk systems to intercept drones is not engaging with reality.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            27 minutes ago

            Pantsir which has point defences rather than just using missiles.

            Pantsir is missiles, just many smaller ones. It’s still $200k missile to stop a $50k drone.

            https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2026/07/08/cheap-ukrainian-drones-are-beating-russias-billion-dollar-s-400-s-300-and-pantsir-air-defense-systems/

            Also, cost of production in Russia is far lower

            Reported prices include foreign exchange rate differences. If Pantsir was built in the US it would be $2M per missile instead of $200k.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              22 minutes ago

              No, Pantsir also has guns for close range interceptions, and you’ve just walked back your original claim by an order of magnitude. But even if we take your 200k number, how would you say that compares to not having AD at all which is the case in Ukraine? Do you think it’s worse having all your infrastructure destroyed or better, if it is a matter of attrition which side do you think is coming out ahead here?

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 minutes ago

                Guns aren’t effective against drones which is why the Pantsir-SMD-E was ordered which removes the guns to add more missiles for drone defense.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantsir_missile_system

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  12 minutes ago

                  Guns are very much effective against large and slow drones that Ukraine sends into Russia. There are tons of videos of them being shot down by guns. It sounds like you’re really out of your depth here. You also dodged my question here.

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !worldnews@lemmy.ml

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 702 users / day
  • 1.24K users / week
  • 3.1K users / month
  • 9.16K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 41.3K subscribers
  • 21.5K Posts
  • 167K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org