• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    ugh not a good sign at all.

    electrification looked to be right around the corner but i guess we have to boil the planet a bit further for the shareholders.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        that’s true, we don’t. my logic is that if they are divesting from renewables and doubling down on oil, it means they see a trend back into oil we aren’t right now. us govt seems to want to stay on it real bad, petrodollar shit.

        could be that they want to surf on the currently high prices too.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You have two wars directly affecting major hydrocarbon exporting countries and the strategic reserves of several countries are at a generational low. Shell is likely betting that oil is going to spike, which probably isn’t bad for electrification as a concept.

          We’ve also been seeing in adjacent industries that the skills to succeed in hydrocarbon related energy don’t exactly transfer well to non-hydrocarbon related energy. Shell may be bad at building out solar because solar works on different scales than they are used to.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            oil is going to spike

            i’m glad we’re mostly depending on ethanol and biodiesel for our food to come to our local groceries. even then it’s gonna be difficult.

            shit is getting shaken up that’s for sure. might be ultimately good that they are doubling down on iran.