And I don’t mean just Google’s Android. Every single iteration. With their stupid memory management for PoWeR sAvInG.

I was typing up a rant on how incredibly boring and stupid Disclosure Day was when I just quickly switched to Firefox to look up a character’s name when Android decided that I was done using my Lemmy client and just outright killed it without even giving it enough time to save my comment to drafts, like it usually does.

You can never be sure when you leave an app whether it will continue doing what it’s supposed to or if it will be frozen or killed.

I’ve got 4 GB of RAM and multiple CPU cores. That should be enough to run a dozen apps in parallel. My frickin N900 with 128 MB had better multitasking than a modern Android smartphone!

  • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    4 days ago

    I disable power management on the apps I use often and never run into the issue. Perhaps that might help create a less frustrating experience for you.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I disable power management on the apps I use often and never run into the issue.

      Power management does nothing when RAM is as constrained as 4GB

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          the question is: why do two, not even three, apps consume all of the 4gb?

          Mozilla had to fire a big part of their browser engineering team to raise the salary of their CEO. That’s how FF is less optimized.

          • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            yes i know that obviously. But what do modern oses do more than they did with the memory limitations back then? They serve you more ads and they convince that taking up literally half of your memory and not even leaving enough resources for two apps is somehow necessary, when older computers hosted the os and the apps comfortably in a tiny fraction of that.

            • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              No, they do a lot more behind the scenes, running far more useful and necessary services.

              Older computers couldn’t do as much as modern computers either.

              Also the thing that almost no one send to have mentioned is that computers are multitaskers. People using a computer use multiple programs all at once while they’re all in focus. On phones that’s not the case unless you’re using a foldable or split screen, in which case it keeps those apps alive indefinitely without refreshing/closing. A phone is otherwise one app at a time, and any app that you haven’t used for a few minutes will get suspended so it doesn’t go back to the old days of Android’s battery life being absolutely atrocious due to apps running “full speed” in the background.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        seriously, lineageos after having dived into every setting is by far the best mobile experience these days, i’m almost never even slightly annoyed by it.

    • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Adding, I disabled all background access to all of the programs I don’t regularly use / expect to return to.

      Only like 5 apps have any background access and they never get auto-cleared.

      Between that and GOS letting me block network access to apps that really shouldn’t need it, my battery lasts for days.