this kinda feels like the hypothetical bartender kicking out the friendly nazi, all of a sudden there’s a big fuss and they scream that the bartender is prejudiced.
incredibly relieving to see it happen, having codeberg turn into an impossible to navigate pile of AI slop would be miserable.
how the fuck is anyone taking these discussions seriously lmao
mayhaps even use it as a motivation to improve 👉👈
Fucking backwards ass shit. You’re damn well on the right track: LLMs tend to avoid swearing (it’s kinda funda-fucking-mentally at odds with how most companies want them to be used), so i think we should respond by cursing like sailors, especially creative swears with wordplay and shit.
It doesn’t guarantee it’s not LLM writing but if nothing else it’s more entertaining.
I assume you realize that saying this implies you consider everything on that list weird, which makes you look like a dick.
see this all makes sense if you have, like, 10 accounts. But 100 accounts is just fucking strange
I’d add on that stuff like this should NOT be the default (unless that is specifically what you advertise your software for, and even then you should give a clear option to disable or change it), because users (even admins using the software for their instance) will generally not configure things much.
What should be done is have it as an opt-in, or prompt the user to pick an option.
If one believes their blocklist/filter is in good faith and beneficial to others and to the world in general, then one shouldn’t feel a need to force others to use it, only inform them that it exists.
please sir, may i have some tokens before my context window-
Hello, how may i help you?
better yet: we KNOW corporate social media is fucking riddled to the bone with filters, hell people talk about “The Algorithm” (praise be) all the time.
And it’s just considered normal. It is how it is. Who cares.
a lot of the textures in minecraft are already based on each other, so i’d be curious how efficient you can make that
To prevent it getting lost i want to point this out in its own top-level comment:
Keep in mind that as the copyright holder you can publish your code under as many licenses as you wish, and charge for whichever licenses you wish.
You could publish it for free under AGPL, charge a smaller sum for developers who want/need a more permissive license like BSD 3-clause, and charge out the ass for a full on proprietary license.
Do note though that you’d have to think about how to handle contributions, as that will be copyright of the respective authors and thus you can’t just merrily go and change the license of their contributions. You’d have to ask them to sign a Contributor License Agreement or just straight up manage the codebases separately (which is a little bit of a mess).
don’t forget that the copyright holder is perfectly free to sell copies of their software under different licenses, OP could provide the GPL copy for free and clearly advertise that buying it under MIT or a non-open license is available.
do mind that (and i’m pretty sure this still works with AGPL but this isn’t gospel) you can have the engine be open source while keeping the assets proprietary and requiring they be purchased to actually sensibly play the game.
This is how the original DOOM works, there’s an ocean of modified doom engines but you still have to buy the assets to play the proper actual DOOM game. You can use alternative asset packs but it’ll look and sound like a fairly different game.
And of course it’s vastly easier to create alternative assets for such a simple game, compared to the labour that would be involved in a larger modern game.
china makes loads of the components in your devices, i don’t think they need to get stuff into the kernel to compromise you…
no musk, i do not want to see how your sausage is made
i am so fucking thankful that i have never used email for any kind of work
are you taking the piss or do you actually think that’s a good answer?
the most basic rule of thumb that should ALWAYS be held to is that a human has to take responsibility for the actions of a tool, computers cannot be held accountable.