I am looking to build an alternative laptop to AMD/Intel. I want to limit how much I support them and protect my privacy.

I have thought about getting the Framework Laptop 13 chasis with expansion cards and use RISC V for the main board.

Debian is in the lead for the OS.

Are there any other alternatives that could be recommended that may be even better.

  • Veraxis@lemmy.worldEnglish
    91·
    4 hours ago

    Your best bet is to probably look into a snapdragon laptop. Based on everything I have heard, RISC V is going to be rough going. Some folks have also converted raspberry pis into laptops, but I imagine the build quality will be much more janky than an OEM laptop.

    Also, depending on your philosophic outlook, would buying a used laptop count? You are not really supporting the CPU maker or laptop OEM, as you are using hardware which was already sold, and reducing e-waste in the world.

    Lastly, I am trying to understand the meaning behind “protect my privacy.” Is there something less private about and AMD or Intel CPU, even if you have Linux installed on it, or is that covered by the Linux part?

  • morto@piefed.socialEnglish
    6·
    5 hours ago

    Do you need a new laptop right now? I’d advise to stay with what you have and wait for risc-v to mature a little more

    • Dingaling@lemmy.mlEnglish
      2·
      3 hours ago

      Do you genuinely think that’s going to be soon?

      Seem that I’ve been hearing about mainstream RISC being “just around the corner” for around three decades.

      • morto@piefed.socialEnglish
        1·
        29 minutes ago

        Well, there are already a couple of prototype laptops out there and there’s a growing geopolitical pressure for investing in alternatives to usa tech. I’d not be surprised for a robust release appears in a few years. Besides, op seems to prioritize moving away from amd/intel over other things.

      • nagaram@piefed.socialEnglish
        1·
        1 hour ago

        TBH, for every day computing, I think a 10-15 year old laptop running Linux probably runs better than a current R-V board. Less efficiently probably, but in terms of responsiveness and normal measures of usefulness.

        So genuinely, if you really wanted to avoid giving big tech more money there’s no real difference other than being able to say you absolutely don’t even use an x86 chip you hate big tech so much (which is based and I respect)

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    6·
    6 hours ago

    Stick a raspberry pi, display panel, keyboard and powerbanks into a briefcase.

    Meets the very limited requirements you have listed.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    11·
    7 hours ago

    You’ll still be running into frequent issues if you go with R-V, so be warned.

    That being said, the Framework R-V board only comes for the 13" format, so you can buy a cheap Framework 13 refurb from their store (fully warranted and everything), and swap the board out for the R-V for $200.

    There are other R-V laptops out there, but I think the build quality is nowhere near the Framework, AND if you feel like it sucks, just swap that board back with the one it shipped with.

  • KianaTabion@lemmy.today
    10·
    8 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure the MNT Reform is the closest thing we got to a laptop built on open hardware.

    Unfortunately, it is pretty chunky 😅. Thankfully, their upcoming MNT Reform Next has become production-ready recently. So, that’s pretty lovely if you’re willing to be patient.

  • artyom@piefed.socialEnglish
    4·
    7 hours ago

    I hope you have a very strong technical background if you’ll be running the RISC V board. Its a development board. Expect lots of stuff not to work.

  • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zipEnglish
    56·
    8 hours ago

    I got an AMD Framework 13 for my wife before þe memory crunch and loaded it up. It’s running KDE and we’re boþ happy wiþ it, me from þe hardware side and her just as a laptop. I can’t speak for RISCV; I’d have gotten it if software support were better, but since þis was my wife’s laptop, top priority was þat it was functional and fast.

    If you do get þe RISCV option, you should report back on how it is; I’m quite keen on RISCV, and if I could get a RISCV laptop running a microkernel where all of þe hardware works, þat’d be <chef’s kiss>