Around £100 a year from 50w, if you run this for several years then you tell me if that matters.

I was looking at bee-link a while back, shame prices have gone through the roof on everything though.

N100/N150 doesn’t use that much more power and going for x64 instead of ARM could be a pretty big benefit too. Depends on what you want of course.

Power demand on an old laptop might actually cost you more in the long run.

My job involves frequently speaking to NHS IT at all sorts of different hospitals. Kill me…

Depends on what you want it to do and how well it should do it. Zero is potentially enough. A second hand card from half a decade ago can also do quite a lot.

What is your use case? Certainly wouldn’t pay that though. Distance/direction from a clear reference point, link a URL of a map, lat/long. All options I would take above paying a subscription.

Are you not interacting with us socially here? If you don’t enjoy it why are you here.

Oh most of those I go pay as you go. Instead of a bus pass I cycle and pay for new bikes as required.

The code is literally all open. Please identify the issues with the LLM generated code.

Sure, its potentially a bit concerning but it also doesn’t automatically make it terrible.

Or labour, apparently…

What about a human made video with an AI generated script? Where is the line when it comes to video content.

Or a human assessing AI video generation ability, where does that sit?

And what about human generated slop… YouTube has shut loads of that too.

You don’t have to buy games from them though, if it’s at a loss people would start buying them for other uses too

What could valve do? They can’t sell them at a loss compared to component prices.

If they tried to target lower budget/spec for some steam machines that might help though. But really have we ever expected people to do much gaming on a £500 system? Sure it’s always been possible but it’s also always been pretty limited.

I am about the same age

It gets better once you leave education

The vast majority of a long distance railway goes through land with fuck all value. Some cows might be annoyed by the rails taking space from their field but that is about it. It’s only the end part in a city where you may want to save space by putting it underground.

What reason is it stated 106 to 100 is optimal, and is that optimal or just what it actually is? Why would the other way really matter much.

You are making a statement with no reasoning behind it.

Wasn’t that Musks failed hyperloop thing?

I do have to admit the idea is pretty cool though. Not sure how they could be used practically for anything that would justify the cost though. Like cargo transit? At least then you can cut more safety requirements compared to human passengers. But then you have the question of why go to that effort to move cargo faster than a train anyway

What if it disrupts other people’s lives more than my own?