The recent federal raid on the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson isn’t merely an attack by the Trump administration on the free press. It’s also a warning to anyone with a smartphone.

Included in the search and seizure warrant for the raid on Natanson’s home is a section titled “Biometric Unlock,” which explicitly authorized law enforcement personnel to obtain Natanson’s phone and both hold the device in front of her face and to forcibly use her fingers to unlock it. In other words, a judge gave the FBI permission to attempt to bypass biometrics: the convenient shortcuts that let you unlock your phone by scanning your fingerprint or face.-

It is not clear if Natanson used biometric authentication on her devices, or if the law enforcement personnel attempted to use her face or fingers to unlock her devices. Natanson and the Washington Post did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The FBI declined to comment.

    • this@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Even better, set it to 1234567890 or 00000000 or similar easy to guess pin, and change it to the length of your actual pin, now if someone tries to bruteforce your phone it will instantly wipe and you can make a case that it was the law enforcement who destroyed any “evidence” by their own actions if in comes up In court.

      • spizzat2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        Don’t they make a copy of the phone before they go about trying to unlock it?

        This kind of security is only going to work against a careless or incompetent atta-- oh. I see…

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I use biometrics to access some of the apps on my phone. But my home screen requires a password to unlock.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    hold the device in front of her face and to forcibly use her fingers to unlock it. In other words, a judge gave the FBI permission to attempt to bypass biometrics

    This isn’t bypassing biometrics. This is using biometrics as intended. Bypassing implies this was an unexpected side effect when every security researcher ever has warned that biometrics is intrinsically vulnerable and a terrible password substitute for this exact reason.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Or at the very least; turn your phone entirely off (shutdown) whenever you expect or encounter police contact.

    Biometrics only work when the device is already running. Mobile devices are in their most locked down/secure state when ‘at rest’, ie shutdown.

    In android; there is also a ‘lockdown’ mode you can quickly activate from the power off screen, that disables Biometrics until next unlock with a pin/pattern, but doesn’t fully shutdown so you can still quickly access things like the camera. This has to be explicitly enabled in settings first and will not offer much protection from various lockscreen bypass software available to law enforcement.

    • myserverisdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      In android; there is also a ‘lockdown’ mode you can quickly activate from the power off screen, that disables Biometrics until next unlock with a pin/pattern, but doesn’t fully shutdown so you can still quickly access things like the camera. This has to be explicitly enabled in settings first and will not offer much protection from various lockscreen bypass software available to law enforcement.

      2 things. Unless I accidentally enabled this setting, it’s on by default. And what do you mean by lockscreen bypass software. What would be the point of lockdown if its not effective against law enforcement trying to brute force your privacy?

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        it’s on by default

        It may well be on by default now. I just know I had to enable it the last time I looked at this.

        what do you mean by lockscreen bypass software

        Tools such as those provided by Cellebrite and similar.

        Lockdown mode is mainly to disable biometrics, to prevent someone on the street forcibly using them to unlock your device. It’s not going to stop an entire agency with more sophisticated tools.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Also, don’t take your phone to protests. ACAB.

      Wear clothing that can’t identify you. Hide tattoos and anything that might make you stand out. Get clothes from a free giveaway place, without cameras.

      • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ve been debating buying a burner phone for protests, leaving my main phone elsewhere, and only powering on the burner when it’s needed. Probably the only way to bring a phone to a protest.

        • domdanial@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You can also buy faraday bags, if you want a phone available but not online. But it’s still there physically so burner would still be a good choice.

    • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      In android; there is also a ‘lockdown’ mode you can quickly activate from the power off screen, that disables Biometrics until next unlock with a pin/pattern

      On iOS, with a locked device, quickly press the lock button five times to do the same, it should bring up the power off/SOS screen, which you can dismiss.

  • JackBinimbul@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Jesus fucking christ.

    I don’t use my phone for anything other than directions, phone calls, and texting my wife. Partially because I’m not going to carry around something with tons of shit that can be used against me.

    This is fucking insane.

      • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Just know that SMS and regular phone services are inherently insecure and to not use them for any conversations you wouldn’t want broadcasted to the whole world.

          • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I don’t think there’s necessarily a safest, thats a moving target and everyone’s threat level is different. There’s a number of open source E2EE encrypted messaging apps though and lots of resources comparing their pros and cons. I can try to find you a link a bit later when I have more time if you’d like.

          • pineapple@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Simplex is probably the safest.

            But I would say signal is very safe while being more convenient.

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    On iPhone say “Hey Siri, who’s phone is this?” to disable biometric unlock temporarily.

    On Android press the power and volume up buttons to open the power off screen, then press “lock down”.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      On the iPhone you can also press both the upper left and right button. It will enable that you can only log in with a password, even if you have Face ID/Touch ID.

      You can also establish that if there are too many false attempts to log in, the phone will delete all data. I could imagine that if you kept most phone data on the phone itself, rather than in the cloud, this can be useful. E.g. insert the password wrongly multiple times.

      And if you’re feeling really concerned, you can make a Faraday cage (preventing it from sending data altogether). Wrap a plastic bag around, then aluminium foil tightly without gaps, then plastic… repeat three times.

      Alternatively, put it in a microwave. Or a stainless trash can with a tight lid, lining the inside with (optional: cardboard first, then…) plastic wrap, maybe more foil. Phone also foiled.

  • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I prefer grapheneos’s numeric pin+fingerprint or alphanumeric password. Plus I get to brag that I have MFA on my phone login (even if you can use only the password).

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I only use a 10-digit pin number I’m guaranteed to never forget. I type it in every time. But, I don’t spend much time on my phone, sometimes I even forget it when I leave the house.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    iOS biometrics is on the phone on an encrypted chip, and Face ID does not work if your eyes are closed… also if you press power 5 times it disable the face id unlock.