• Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility for blind folks.

    While this is optional, it is encouraged. Thanks!

  • Cattail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Then: what’s the reason to innovate without capitalism?

    Me: first of many is wanting to make the lives of the people you live better

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    the only reason we crawled out of the ocean and onto land was because we had to go to work or else our boss would get mad

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Almost definitely not.

      Unless they invented it to increase their own already considerable wealth, of course, in which case they would have gotten their thirty million pieces of silver for dooming most of humanity.

  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Which came first? Inventions or Intellectual Property laws? You obviously can’t have the one without the other.

    • shane@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Copyright was to prevent unscrupulous printers from making copies of an author’s works without paying them. So basically a sort of market control to encourage writing. Now most copyright is owned by big companies, and the very biggest companies (AI giants) just ignore copyright and have no penalties.

      (I know copyright is not the same as patent, I just thought that I’d mention this anyway!)

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    To see people behaving greedily under capitalism and conclude greed is human nature is the same as to see people drowning in the ocean and conclude drowning is human nature.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Most hunter gatherers don’t innovate or try anything new. Their lives are basically the same as their mothers and fathers.

    It was agriculture, not capitalism, that started our rapid transformation. We only started agriculture after hundreds of thousands of years.

  • Johnny_Arson [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Alt Text: Image of a recreation of an early human.

    Top Text: Damn I should experiment with my resources to create new things and overall improve my quality of life

    Bottom Text: But unfortunately capitalism doesn’t exist yet so I have no incentive to innovate or try anything new at all

  • pilferjinx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Greed. Does it even exist? Human nature or merely an emergent phenomenon of nature itself. What would humanity have to eviscerate from ourselves to remove greed from our so-called nature?

    ~ Just silly shower thoughts not to be taken seriously.

      • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ok, haha. I said ‘no offense’ so…
        I actually meant to write more but I got a call.
        It’s just that while there’s plenty wrong with capitalism, this post doesn’t really hit the mark. In the context of a Neanderthal, most innovation would require very little investment of resources, and even larger projects which might require community involvement would be organized through examples, trust and like mindedness, or tribal dominance. Only once much larger and complex innovative projects needing regulated investment of some sort are considered, does capitalism even make sense. And then it makes sense for the same reasons that early capitalism can contribute a lot to growth and wellbeing.