??? What does that even mean LOL

🤨

You really gonna go with some Россия 1/Первый Канал/RT bullshit like that? Yeet for IDK, a year? Nah permaban TBH

Taking sides in an inter-imperialist conflict like that, on the side of the aggressor even, but then also spewing BS like that. Bye bye 👋

I don’t support Ukraine either, but buying shit like that? Your other stuff seemed good, but oh well ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Edit: I like to think of permabans on here in the following way: I don’t mind if people change, then decide to leave their old accounts behind and rejoin us on here again

Voyager also breaks the profile of every single person you interact with 🙃

Isn’t that what story points are for? :p

thx, sure go for it ^^’

It’s not mine, like I didn’t make it, but I don’t know where I got it either

Saved :3

Laughing at a 27 million death toll is not trolling “tankies”…

Holy shit, get in touch with reality

But did they stop selling in the USA after e.g. the invasion of Grenada and Iraq and civilian bombing of Yugoslavia?

And obvious question is whether they still do business with the Zionazis…

🫡 doing the good work!

(You earned a report for your previous comment BTW 😁. Did just resolve it LOL)

My specific goal with this was to understand the mainstream anarchist/ancom definition of a central point of anarchist thought.

I would very much disagree that definitions are not important (but would differentiate between clear definition and semantic arguing).

Like in Marxism how people define socialism can be a categorically opposed group of people.
Without definitions, words have no meaning and theory becomes useless. And without revolutionary theory there cannot lasting revolutionary praxis!

TL;DR: We should be clear about our goals and our enemies. Since I wanted to genuinely understand a crucial part of anarchist thought, I very much am interested in definitions.

Edit: Political economy is a science (even if a “soft”/social one) and the scientific method of analysis requires clear terms.

Of course we are also talking about Philosophy here, but even there, useful discussion cannot be had without consensus of basic definitions.

Will give this a read too, thanks.

Also I meant “no 'bread’tube” in the sense of: I don’t want to hear Contrapoints (or Philosophy Tube as well unfortunately 😔) or any other masquerading liberals opinion on this and am not interested in watching a video essay.
(See post edit)

I’ll gladly read this piece by Andrewism :)

Same with Deng unfortunately 😔