• atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 hour ago

    He is the only one on the island but there are more developers. Hammond even says to “call his team In Cambridge”.

  • GrantsGhost@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    This joke comes from people ignoring the following:

    1. The presence of Ray Arnold the Chief Engineer who also worked with computers (not to the same level as Nedry)

    2. Jurassic Park was operating with a skeleton crew at the time and Hammond thought the automated systems would work because he was assured as much from his Chief IT guy.

    3. Nedry has a whole team working on the park’s IT system. And I’m not just referencing book material. Hammond even said in the BLOODY movie “call Nedry’s team on the main land” when shit started going down.

    So no. Hammond was not stupid enough to trust the entire park’s computer infrastructure on just one guy.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I dont remember the movie well but I thought everyone left the island and this was the minimum team left behind.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      I was just thinking about this yesterday - and how it seems like one of the very few flaws with the film was how unclear they made this. Nearly everyone misunderstands this. It would have really helped if there’d been a couple more lines on it, or shots of staff clearing out, etc. Instead it seemed like there were about 10 people at the whole park.

    • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 minutes ago

      Nedry was the systems engineer, Arnold was the operations admin. One was a construction worker, the other was the architect. Neither can truly do the other’s job, but are aware of how they do it.

  • snowsuit2654@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s exactly the point. They did spare expenses, on a lot of things.

    John Hammond Jurassic Park book spoilers

    John Hammond is clearly portrayed as a villain in the book. They lightened him up in the movie.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Supposedly, that is the whole deal with the Chilean Sea Bass that he gloats about. Spared no expense. Apparently that fish sounds fancy, but is actually super cheap. The whole park needed to have the shine of a top-of-the-line facility, but in the end, Ingen and Hammond had no idea what they were really cooking up.

      The raptors for instance, I always got the feeling that paddock was kind of small and rapidly constructed. Those things had killed multiple people in the past, and the park’s response was cram them into a jail cell. You’d think an intelligent, dangerous animal, that was not part of the tour or experience would be euthanized, rather than risk the whole park…but here is Ingen not dealing with the problem, and instead, actively making more raptors.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They just needed Chris Pratt, Raptor Whisperer and they would have been fine.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The movie really dumbed Hammond down to “overly optimistic money guy with a vision”. Which was a bit distasteful if you’ve read the books. Just a bit.

    • watson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The book was a million times better than the movie. It was the first time I had read a novel that was turned into a movie and then saw the movie after reading the novel.

      14-year-old me had never been so disappointed. And it taught me to never ever read the book before the movie.

      • criticon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        My wife always gets excited when a book she loves is being adapted (right now Verity and project hail Mary) but I learned from many disappointments to not get excited. I still watch most of them but I don’t expect too much

        • watson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 minutes ago

          After seeing the trailer for project, Hail Mary, it seems like they’re gonna stick pretty close to the book. Like they did with the Martian.

        • watson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 minutes ago

          For me, it was really mostly the story changes they made so the movie could be rated PG instead of R. They also made some changes to some of the characters and the dialogue which made it come off a lot more cheesy than the book. Although, I will say, gender swapping the kids was a good move. I liked that it was the girl who was the UNIX whiz. In 1993, that felt like an especially fresh take.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I saw once that the reason Kristen Stewart was so hated in the Twilight movies is because all the young women who grew up reading the books imagined themselves as Bella. They were never going to like whichever actress was cast into the role since they would no longer be able to project their own likeness onto the protagonist.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ah, a rubber duck debugging adherent. At least they paid good money for a professional.

    • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Arnold was an engineer, though. He was competent in using the system and not totally lost when poking around the code, but he’s no computer scientist. Basically, he was a power user / sysadmin rather than a developer.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Pretty farken standard. IT isn’t considered important unless they want their personal laptop de-porned

      • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        As a young child who didn’t yet know what Barbasol was, I was still a little disappointed to find out that the can was not, in fact, filled with delicious whipped cream