I’m all about giving back unused land. Start with all national and state parks. At least their culture is to respect the land and try to live in harmony.
The thing that gets me, the Australian native people lived here for hundreds of thousands of years, and lived in harmony with nature. Then the brits came in the 1700s, and fucked everything up and pillaged. Fuckin brits.
The post they were replying to said hundreds of thousands. No one would reasonably think that someone saying hundreds of thousands means 0.2 hundred thousand.
You don’t understand that land back being ALL of the land back not being a true possibility and the responder saying its a start to make light of it still being a good thing? Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
I’m all about giving back unused land. Start with all national and state parks. At least their culture is to respect the land and try to live in harmony.
The thing that gets me, the Australian native people lived here for hundreds of thousands of years, and lived in harmony with nature. Then the brits came in the 1700s, and fucked everything up and pillaged. Fuckin brits.
Tens of thousands, but yes
Tens is a number of thousands!
The post they were replying to said hundreds of thousands. No one would reasonably think that someone saying hundreds of thousands means 0.2 hundred thousand.
We agree, fuck all colonisers in the past, now and forever.
No, they literally all have syphilis and are actively hostile to consent.
Land back means all of it.
Well yes eventually, and this salad means all of it, but i do need to choose a first place to put my fork.
It’s a start.
Nanook… You have a familiar name to someone I occasionally see in Chivalry 2. Do you play?
What is? Why are you replying to us?
They mean that giving back the state and national parks is a start to giving back all the land. :)
Thanks for explaining!
do you always get like this when people agree with you?
You misread our tone. We are more confused than anything else.
You don’t understand that land back being ALL of the land back not being a true possibility and the responder saying its a start to make light of it still being a good thing? Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
Ah, then we disagree. Thank you for explaining. No, we just didn’t understand what they meant.
It is very difficult when someone else was the one who made the comment and this reply chain is to that entity, not the one replying to all this.
Why are you using “we” for referring to yourself?
Why the fuck not?
cele is plural
https://pluralpedia.org/w/Plurality
Oh dear. Blocked.
Removed by mod
This ain’t it, chief.
Well, now everyone knows what happened to Vault 013.
No thank you.