• slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Do you wanna spend 80 dollars on a new game, or wait a year and buy it for 10 dollars when it works and is actually finished?

      WHERE CAN I PRE ORDER IT FOR 120 DOLLARS TO PLAY IT 3 DAYS EARLY AND PAY TO BE A PLAYTESTER?

      Like i’m not surprised why games are this expensive.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s the kicker. Getting games on release now feels like early access. I’ve been hyped for a few games in day one and there’s either server issues, driver issues, crashes, what have you. These things are so rushed they need a year to be finished.

        By then you’ll know if it flops too, avoid getting caught in the hype.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    People are struggling to buy groceries.

    CEO: Let’s raise the price of a good people don’t need because money.

    I can only hope this move backfires spectacularly.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s The Outer Worlds. It will.

      The first game was shit. The game it was confused with became the greatest game ever made. Go buy that one instead.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        No man’s sky is not anywhere near the greatest game ever made. Id honestly take outer wilds over either game being discussed. Outer wilds has a charm that’s impossible for a AAA studio to match, and it’s a solid gravity sandbox besides that.

        The NMS game loop is just trying to make number go up as efficiently as possible for nanites and credits. It’s not fun. It is and always has been a grind.

        • overload@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          This was peak satire given you genuinely thought that they were talking about NMS and then proceeded to talk about Outer Wilds, the true game that OP was referencing, by accident.

        • Owl@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Where does No man’s sky come from ? How could it be confused with The outer worlds ? People confuse it with outer wilds, both no man’s sky.

          • LordGimp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Other commenter said NMS, I confused it with this one thinking they were talking about the same thing.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        What game was it confused with?

        NVM, I just realized it was No Man’s Sky. Though I seem to recall that the launch of that game was also a shit show. I’ve heard it got much better as time went on.

        • EveningPancakes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          No, they’re referring to The Outer Wilds. They’re absolutely right, The Outer Wilds was infinitely better than The Outer Worlds. Granted, they were doing different things but holy shit I wish I could replay Other Wilds for the first time again. One of the best experiences ever!

  • C1pher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yea, no thanks dawg. First game was boring AF, and on top of that, now you want 80 bucks?

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Agreed. $40? Id think about it and probably wait for a sale anyways. $80 is just laughable and completely removes any temptation i had to check it out.

  • overload@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Best of luck with that. I got the first game for free and still haven’t played it. I say that as a fan of obsidian/old Bethesda i.e. the person you should be trying to get buy your game.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s kinda mid, id suggest Tainted Grail if ya want a Bethesda like game. Doesn’t quite scratch the itch but it’s close enough.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Better than Starfield as a sci-fi RPG. Had some pretty boring balance choices imo. Dialogue was decent but I didn’t really love anything.

        Yeah, I don’t like it, but mid is fair… And I’ll buy #2 anyways if the reviews hold up.

        People are free to complain about the price point but it’s pretty absurd to think gaming is somehow immune to inflation.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m now replacing this game with Clockwork Revolution to keep an eye on since it’s the producer of the first 2 fallout games.

      • overload@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I was probably a bit uncharitable. TBF it is on my backlog of games I intend to play. It’s just not a game I would want to pay $80 USD for based on what I’ve seen review wise.

        • Nexz@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s indeed worse. I cancelled at least half a year ago. Standard practice these days, lure consumers with great value for money and then make it worse by the day - line goes up! <insert cat-newspaper-meme: I should be a CEO />

  • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Was there a big contingent of people waiting for a sequel? I recall the original game being massively hyped and actually being pretty disappointing once I played it.

  • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    even if wages increased with inflation and 80 dollar games weren’t so distressing, the first outer wilds fucking sucked and I have no hope for the sequel

    • Pnut@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t know. It seems like they’re addressing the issues that the first one had. It was too safe and far too full of itself. It should have just been one big planet and a bit less goofy. Seems like the next one is shaping up for that. Also, if there is a game company that I trust right now it’s obsidian. I was super disappointed with the ending just being the same slides they used for new Vegas, hopefully we at least get a more satisfying ending.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Two years after The Outer Worlds: “oh mods will make it better, I got it for free”

      They didn’t.

      I respect the same for the second game. But also free. And wasting SSD space.