Do they care about what e-mail you use? Weird.

Does not work for many of us

Endless envy to you

Welp, I just shorted a bit. I guess bears think alike, or something…

It exerts too much Control to the users.

I’ll see myself out

Ah, that would be a loophole.

Wdym death of windows, is this another of those clickbait vids?

Dunno why people think this is the worst solution. Don’t many of those people love to pee in streets, rather than bother to find toilets? This sounds like an excellent deterrent, and that it works shows that people needed comparative incentive to use the toilet.

Yeah, not everything is about the homeless. Are there actually many homeless in Munich, compared to rude tourists?

Now, Mint should support the need decently enough, although it takes some setup. You can look up for language setup settings, I found that fctix works well nowadays.

Judging by the Parser newtype, he did.

I don’t understand why their share is rising, not falling. Is there anything I am not understanding here? Will people rely even more on Amazon after this incident?

? Watching people playing games in your spare time is “being exploited”? Do we have to play games to enjoy them?

Ah, joy of commutative algebra.

Wait until you get to noncommutative algebra… shudders. No one who mastered that monster of a subject is sane in any measure.

I mean, it would help you understand what a ring is, if you know monoids. It clearly helps. Right? …right?

I mean, that one is a tame example compared to e.g. https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/homological+algebra

deleted by creator

My main laptop is on linux, through and through. I just don’t have the courage to talk about transition to Linux with my family…

I am a chicken, I could not make the switch for the home desktop and work computer, so I just downgraded to Windows 11. There are some financial apps that needs switching, damn.

Maybe I could convince people to let me use Linux at work…

Pushing for insecure post-quantum algorithms, that may be secure against quantum computers

Eh, I doubt that is how it works. We do not have quantum computers yet, so how we prove security in quantum settings is by specifying the adversary to have specified quantum capabilities, in addition to classical capabilities. Hence, broken under traditional attack means broken under quantum attack.

You can say that new post-quantum schemes are less verified compared to established classical schemes, but that does not mean classical is necessarily more secure.

I thought we eat acorns after processing them? There are cuisines which involve acorns as main ingredient.