since endeavour is very close to arch I hope I’ll find some solutions in that realm.

Smart thinking. I don’t use arch (btw) either, so I’m merely a cheerleader at this point. Yes, I’d downgrade the kernel for the sake of Science. Find a popular stable kernel, jump to that and see if it behaves better.

(That may be my bias: I only really do enterprise linux, so after 28 years since I moved from slackware I’m really risk-averse!)

Azure compliance framework is 100% an Azure services upsell versus a genuine security focus initiative.

You’re telling me that a compliance test made by a vendor seems to only test how much you’ve spent with the vendor and not how secure you are?

I’m shocked.

Yeah so grub can see the disk but then the kernel can’t. Efi and other tricks aren’t involved.

I think your route is to find out why the kernel hates your ass. Probably an upd pulled a driver … But who removes the SATA or nvme stuff?

Either way, it’s in the kernel and not the boot or the core apps. I don’t use endeavour, where I could provide better help, but I think the kernel is your best suspect for this crime.

Mature software doesn’t need hourly updates. All the shit that leverages the library repos in horribly unsafe ways - ohai npm - that stuff needs constant updates.

In related news, evolution is hard to see up close.

Still very low on SLSA and iso27002. This should only inhibit uptake, but security people have the worst blind spots.

They think with whatever the fuck makes you think of people as “resources”.

Yeah. They change their own titles, but I worry it’s still the same – they just remembered the ‘human’ part of ‘human resources’ is merely an adjective.

As I’ve said before: HOW ABOUT NO

HOW ABOUT NO

The server part seems to be container-only. That’s a shame if you’re aware of iso27002 or SLSA.

and its clear you have negligible programming experience, or creative experience for that matter, to be coming after the concept of sharing code like-so.

As someone with several years of experience as a programmer: fuck off with this elitist nonsense

Well said. Bit of a Straw Man, there.

till

'til

The canonical method was with a kickstart, and if it looks like too complex, remember you should have one stashed in /root already that you just need to mod.

Normally a kickstart is a bit much, otherwise, though. I use a suite of tools but the best one I used was a simple virtual package to bring in the others, drop configs in and start daemons. We did this in like 2001 to great effect.

Kill it with fire.

I worked in the industry before Systemd.

Systemd fills a niche it manufactured. It fills it poorly, supplanting established and reliable incumbents with something that is neither. In a world where Unix tools do one thing and well, Systemd does all things marginally.

Nfsroot. Portable skills. Clear source of truth. Pick one.

Something else will come along with an entourage of fanboys pushing for it to be the next porting language.

It’ll be great; until the next one comes along.

By then the kernel will be so slow that Linux will die.

The USA is not a democracy

This question is not relevant: you’re not voting based on how the country is now, or was last week. You’re voting based on how the country should be, each time. You’re picking the least-bad leader out of a small set of options, based on whether they’re even marginally better.

In this case, a LOT of alternatives are better than the current setup, so I don’t understand the dilemma.

…thus, the suspicion about trolling.

Should I vote Republican to slow down full blown let it all hang out fascism because I don’t want to vote Democrat?

1. Evolution means choosing the better option in each case to invoke slow but important beneficial change
2. Harm reduction is a great short-term strategy
3. There’s absolutely no reason to ever vote the elitist racist party of kiddy-diddlers
4. If you’re feeling like not voting, or voting in a way that harms people for no gain ever, then you may be a victim of manipulation by the conservatives so you don’t vote against them. They’re good at this.

Questions asking whether someone should vote in a way that causes harm can sound like a trolling question. I’m sorry if other respondents treat it as such.

Is the CI/CD still a faithful clone of github’s worst-in-show setup? Because if I had a plan for ditching GL, the CI keeps forgejo from being a contender.

There is a community edition but serious users will run into its limitations

No true Scot, then?

I’m running gitlab implementations at a few sites. I’ve not seen or heard of any performance limiter with a self-managed community edition that removes a tool the others still provide.

and it does not integrate neatly with external solutions.

Again, this sounds FUDdy. Which ‘external solutions’ are you using that a git-push fails on? Some spaghetti of saas tendrils seems to be already a risk, but I can’t think of any other external thing that it could mess up with.