Calculator Manipulator

  • 6 Posts
  • 441 Comments
Joined 7 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 16th, 2019

help-circle





  • Illecors@lemmy.cafetoLinux@programming.dev*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Only answering your last paragraph. You will not, ever, find a 1:1 equivalent for a few reasons, but mostly because:

    • Windows quircks do not have to be accomodated in Linux distros
    • Microsoft has very much encouraged massive software where everything is done in a single application, whereas in UNIX world the philosophy is to do one thing and do it well.
    • Not sure how DFS works, but with the myriad of networked filesystems available I’m sure there’s an exact requirement match.

    Users can be centrally managed in a myriad of ways, but the most used software seems to be following the same X.500 standard - OpenLDAP, FreeIPA, etc.

    Machines can be centrally managed via Puppet, Chef, etc.

    Company software is managed by having your own repo.

    SELinux can be used for incredibly granular access controls, but I can’t see most companies actually needing that.


    To sum it up - you’ll always have trouble if you’re solving a windows problem in linux and vice versa. Just for a moment, try imagining a situation where you want to switch a 100% linux company to windows.






  • Illecors@lemmy.cafetoAutism@lemmy.worldI hate family gatherings
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    You a teen, it’s fine - we’ve all been there. I’ll tell you something I wish someone had told me when I was a teen - people are trying to reach out to you, but you’re actively shutting them down. Quit being a dumb edgy ass and form some memories together - it won’t be long until you start missing last chances.





  • Filled in the survey. A few notes:

    • Some of my answers make no sense on the surface - like the “experiment with new technology” block (4 questions). I’ve answered “Agree” to all of them, because I have taken time into account, which is not represented on the questions. Long story short - I do love experimenting with new tech, I’m almost always the first one to try something among my peers, but at the same I never blindly jump in (I’m hesitant) as most of the “new technology” is just
      • Someone repackaging foss and relabeling it
      • Some LLM bullshit
      • An inferior product to what already exists

    There are also scenarios where I have already found something that’s the best solution for my case, so I won’t even bother looking at something new, even if it might be the best thing since sliced bread for someone else.

    • TIme and effort setting up/maintaining (4 questions). It doesn’t take much time nor effort to set anything up now, but it did when I was starting out initially. I knew very little and a bunch of concepts hadn’t clicked, yet, so it took me days to set up Nextcloud and about half a year (on and off. Probably a week or so if it were all squeezed together) for email.

    • The performance and intent to use in the future questions are weird - they feel like the same question, just leveling off in intensity. I’ve selected the same answer for all of them. They probably should’ve been a single question with agree/disagree options swapped for intensity levels.

    Good luck with your PhD!