CapgrasDelusion

Yeah, it won’t. Only Plex’s own screengrabs.

For Plex:

In YouTube download-material settings: Extra-> check “generate nfo files”

In plex, create a library called “YouTube” or whatever you’d like, category set to “other videos”. Use scanner: “Plex Video Files Scanner” set agent to “Personal Media.”

Under Plex settings “Agents” make sure under both the “movies” and “shows” tabs that the “personal media” agent is set to use “Local Media Assets” and that that is top priority.

Plex will use the nfo files generated by ytdl for metadata.

I believe there is a dedicated YouTube series agent, but those can be finicky. This way, ytdl has already done all the metadata work.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

That’s certainly quotes around a lot of things I didn’t say. I admit I need to do a better job seeing past my own biases.

I also admit OPs posting pattern is materially irrelevant to the contents of the Washing Post article on its own. I was just pointing out a larger pattern within the c/worldnews community as a whole. In that context someone with an agenda can have influence.

But I’m not sure why I did. They seem like a nice person and post good faith articles. This was probably a misaimed shot on my part, true or not.

I didn’t attack the source. I just pointed out that someone posting more than most on lemmy could push a certain point of view using any and all sources if they cherry pick.

If this is a play on my username, I laughed.

I actually read most of Nightowl’s submissions for the reason you mention, to read outside my “narrative.” But they have an agenda and people should know that.

As far as I can tell, this prolifically posting account has literally never posted an article that wasn’t negative on Ukraine, and posts about 90% negative on the West in general. For whatever that’s worth.

With this headline Bloomberg seems to be implicitly (borderline explicitly) saying that the wealth loss is tied to the war in Ukraine. Here is the actual report this article is based on:

https://www.ubs.com/global/en/media/display-page-ndp/en-20230815-global-wealth-report-2023.html

No mention of Ukraine. The wealth loss is tied to inflation, appreciation of the dollar to other currencies, and losses in the financial sector.

deleted by creator

This has gotten fucking ridiculous. Move on.

Also a very valid route. Just depends on your tolerance and time for dealing with bullshit I suppose.

I’d replace them, keep the old ones, and put them back when I move out. This is also my go-to with apartment showerheads.

They’re implying people can go make an account on those other instances to continue to use lemmy. Smugly.

deleted by creator

The fact that issuing this order publically is such an obvious BFLNN certainly raises the question, “Does Judge Cannon want to be removed from this case?”

Are there not… less publicly idiotic ways to do that?

I hope the January 6th trial moves quickly because she is absolutely going to delay this one as long as Trump wants, if not outright tank the case. Even if she’s removed it starts the clock all over again. But I do look forward to another absolute smackdown from the 11th circuit. The last one was brutal and a great read.

The F16 will be vulnerable but not completely useless, as implied by the other post.

It’s kind of bizarre. The original article says (in a very repetitive and long-winded way) Europe needs to step up its military spending and send more of their own troops to the eastern borders to be able to counter Russian aggression on their own in the face of a potentially unreliable US who may be more focused on China. I honestly don’t think the US would disagree here. Strong allies aren’t a bad thing.

Economically it argues (again, in very unnecessarily long wording) the US will make decisions regarding protecting itself from a rising China without concern for Europe.

My opinion, this is probably true, although Europe might want to be concerned about China in its own right. Again, I’m not convinced the US wouldn’t want strong economic partners either. This only gets into disagreement territory if the EU intends to partner with China to counter the US. That will go about as well as it did partnering with Russia for their energy dependence.

Bottom line the article makes just two arguments that I’m fairly sure the US would agree with, in an unnecessarily inflammatory way that does seem intended to drive a wedge between the US and EU. I’m not sure if they’re just being salty, just trying to use emotion to rile people up to get things done, or if their goal is the second argument, an economic wedge, in which case they’re arguing to tie themselves to another despot.

The F-35 has been operating over Syria for years against those supposedly infallible Russian AA defenses. So far the only thing that’s been able to hit them is a bird.