[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
Intel Arc discrete GPUs released 2022
seems like a joke copycat of nicole
edit: profile looks like a troll
that’s just adding images in the post body instead of as an attachment to the post itself. though yeah that’d be the preferred way to do it
If it’s just an unchanging “no” and strongly in favor of not having the status quo go anywhere, I would indeed say that is “not leading anywhere”. Not changing what people think and how things were before is “not leading anywhere”.
nobody can’t just say “but the developers are working really hard”, or “a bunch of people actually use it” and make it all suddenly go away
That’s not what anyone’s saying either. AHemlocksLie said the article—instead of saying “we know better what the users want”—expresses frustration at caring and working a ton at (blind) accessibility only for people to say GNOME devs don’t care about (blind) accessibility; nowhere did they say that makes GNOME accessibility good. In the context of us understanding what AHemlocksLie said, I think it’s not aberating that we interpreted your reply the way we did.
squaresinger said what you think you said in their last reply. Look at the positive response to them.
You’re not criticizing. You’re saying “no matter how much people try to improve this, this will always be objectively worthless, because this is objectively worthless”. Nobody said you’re not allowed to criticize GNOME. Criticism includes specific directions to improve on and does not involve neglecting the size of the userbase to claim your personal preferences extend to objective truth.
It takes quite a few liberties with the sciency bits and lawyer bits
Do you have the same opinion with Better Call Saul?
Hyprland and dwl are actual, existing tiling dwms for Wayland.
i wonder what you thought “dwl” stood for lol
Arch is simple famously because it’s the “know your system” distro.
Also, I’m fairly sure the novice user would have a secondary or mobile device.
absolutely no tiling dwms have ever been seen for wayland ever
hyprland? dwl?
Do you have to dunk on something just because it’s decidedly not for you? There are, in fact, many avid GNOME users who’ve tried Plasma or other DEs, including Linus Torvalds.
Even external and blind reviewers like Fireborn said GNOME was the only working option on Wayland.
Not just the installer but setting up stuff for a11y in general.
For me personally I cannot externally observe how obvious my sarcasm is, so I always use it just in case. Plus on many platforms you can spoiler the /s anyways.
/s
Sorry that I couldn’t see where you included that. Could you do me a favor and quote what components exactly need to have work done for a solid base? (brownie points if they refer to postmarketOS’s Plasma Mobile as a starting point) Note that I’m already aware of the driver layer issues. I’m really curious about this solid base you mention.
Okay, what more needs to be in postmarketOS Plasma in order so that it has a “solid base”?
i do
end of story :)
fun fact: the chinese nicknamed RGB lighting as “light pollution”