• Rolder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fission gets a bad rap. The amount of waste it produces is minuscule compared to the amount of waste generated by fossil fuels, and it’s generally easier to deal with too. Just needs actual proper maintenance and care.

      • brisk@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t think there are too many people arguing against fission who are in favour of coal

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You say that but that’s practically Australia in a nutshell, nuclear is explicitly banned for the purposes of energy production

          • brisk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The coal plants are decommissioning due to costs, renewable energy is booming, and (obviously due to the ban) there is no local nuclear industry or expertise. Even if you manage to lift the ban, which nobody is trying to do*, nuclear would not be replacing coal plants here, but might divert renewable funding. In other countries I have no doubt building more nuclear could offset coal, not here.

            * The coalition claims to be in favour of nuclear power, but they’ve spruiked it before in opposition, and nothing gets tabled when they’re in power. It’s got as much chance of happening as high speed rail.

    • Jojo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Biggest and just about onliest problem with nuclear fission is how expensive it is to set it up, both in terms of time and money.

      Edit: typo