• Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s an open source browser based on Firefox with additional features and configuration tweaks.

      Except they recently made part of it proprietary and hid the source code for that, so most other people cannot actually build the same one.

      They claim they will make that part open source too, eventually, and it is due to behavior of another browser: https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Floorp-core/issues/62

      • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        They do say that

        They will be using a different repository with a different license for some of its new features

        “different license” suggests to me it might be a proprietary/fauxpen source licene, since this is explicitly being done to punish a fork.

        • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          It may be. The person saying that has contributed artwork but is not the maintainer. It is a bad look though. It sounds like they want to build the next release in secret so the fork can’t release features first.

        • FlumPHP@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yeah. The maintainer said in their blog post they’re looking for a license that lets people read the code but not fork it. Isn’t that just standard American copyright?

          Edit: Looks like they went with CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International). So not an open source license and one that CC themselves recommends not using for software.

    • Nia [She/Her]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The Firefox part is open source, but now some of the stuff they add to it is closed source. Similar to what Vivaldi does by having the UI closed source but the other parts open source.

      It’s somewhat open source but now we don’t know what’s actually going on under the hood, they could stick anything they want in that private section and we’d never know what. Not necessarily a red flag on its own, but no longer proper open source, just another app.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Some time ago, a bunch of really smart people wanted to be able to modify software, so it can never be broken since they can fix it. Thus began open source, which is having a piece of software tell everybody exactly how to make it. Meanwhile, many companies don’t want people to modify their software, usually because they don’t want people easily competing with them and bankrupting them due to creating a better modification. Such software that isn’t open source is termed “proprietary”.

      Floorp was one of these open source softwares. Some ambitious Japanese people modified Firefox, added some features and customizations, and named it “Floorp”.

      Recently, these people decided, for whatever reason, to stop the public from being able to access some of the materials and configurations for making Floorp. They did this by creating a new “warehouse” to store these materials, sealing off the access to it, and replacing the original location of the now proprietary materials with a note that tells you the location of the warehouse you can’t get in.

      (Hopefully that wasn’t confusing…)