• ليتني كوري شمالي @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    ROK had three main advantages that allowed it to be more prosperous than DPRK:

    1. It wasn’t mostly destroyed by the US during the war.
    2. It has plenty of plains suitable for farming while DPRK has steep mountainous terrain.
    3. It wasn’t sanctioned or embargoed.

    Other events like the fall of the USSR and a major flood have also set DPRK back.

    It will be interesting to watch if DPRK becomes the more prosperous nation long-term due to socialism simply being a better economic system and what this will mean for future reunification. But I am getting ahead of myself.

    • leftOverLife@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It will be interesting to watch if DPRK becomes the more prosperous nation long-term

      Its been interesting to see the recent economic successes of the DPRK and to watch how even the capitalist media in the US is starting to concede to it. Now, whether that means that the US is going to try to get them to “open up” like China did is anyone’s guess.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, the new policy is they’re not going to seek reunification, but I think that mostly implies that they see no reason to take over the south by force. If there was a collapse in the south, integrating it would mean removing US presence from their border. And that would be very valuable.