• Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It just gets worse and worse. I figured that the goodbye message he posted wouldn’t be the end of it. Thankfully it seems to be down now so it’s not causing harm anymore directly but still.

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Gotta say, I’ve enjoyed this whole drama. This seems like the end of the story arc. It’s been fun guys. Better than beans.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          He kept claiming they’re AP, but refused to provide proof. Not sure but as it happens, startrek.website defederated us as soon as we banned him.

          • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Huh, weird how the framing of the defedederation lines up so well to what ap and Kirk would say.

            https://startrek.website/post/42709922

            If you’re not familiar with how Lemmy/the Fediverse works, basically everything you read at StarTrek.website is hosted by us, even if the content originated elsewhere. That means we are responsible for everything here and we have to decide if we are comfortable boosting content from other instances.

            If you’re curious, the final straw here was learning that db0 explicitly allows hosting discussions about hurting people, which needless to say goes against our instance values and we simply don’t have the manpower to moderate that volume of content incoming from their server to a degree that we feel meets our quality standards, which left defederating as the only viable option.

            In keeping in line with past trends we’re announcing this because is is a larger instance and don’t want to leave any of the crew confused as to why something may be missing.

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Startrek.website is probably also run by Admiral Patrick, or maybe he’s just someone with admin access there. Either way they seem like bad news, that site should definitely be avoided.

              • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I don’t think I’ve heard anything positive about the instance so completely unsurprised by what they did AND how they were happy to blame db0 for everything while continuing darvo.

                Only sad this comment didn’t federate before the post was locked

                So this user of yours will also be banned for not following the instance values?

                https://startrek.website/u/kirk

                Specifically not following authenticity, ie saying they’re a different user but could be trying to increase the moderation you may need to do, and extremely disrespectful, unless that value only counts towards members of this instance.

                This is being brought up specifically as while yes you are a small instance non of this apart from that user would bring traffic here you would need to moderate so it seems as if you are just doing this to cut off a large portion of the fediverse explicitly against principles those in star trek would be for.

  • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    23 hours ago

    What a loser. Tiny whiny loser.

    Fabulous reaction time from db0 & team!

    So who is this loser, I mean it’s a tiny whiny bit illegal what he did it seems…

  • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m confused. dubvee.org is down and the tesseract repo was also pulled. How is this being deployed? What instances are hosting this version of tesseract?

    I would like to see this javascript myself because DDOSing with open source code in your name is a whole new level of unwise.

    Also wtf is up with the 100 - 1 + 1 expression? Is this some weird JavaScript quirk?

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Dubvee is down down now (server not responding), but prior to that the site had a really bitchy “farewell” message. The DDOS was embedded javascript code your browser would run when you visited dubvee.org and viewed the message.

      Archive.org has a snapshot of it, but it still has that javascript embedded so I’m not going to link to it. Here’s a screenshot of the site when this code was included.

    • JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Also wtf is up with the 100 - 1 + 1 expression? Is this some weird JavaScript quirk?

      If searching online for a JS random number generator code, something like Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1) ) + min; is the most common result. If you’re lazy or don’t care, you just fill in the min and max and get that 100 - 1 + 1

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I don’t think the DDoS code was FOSS. I think their frontpage index.html was set to a static html file just for the flounce.

      • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        So individual tesseract instances all reference the same static remote HTML file hosted by the the tesseract dev instead of one shipped with each instance?

      • Wobble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I am not sure what the other preventative actions have been taken. Is it feasible to defederate from this and any other instance that is administered from this person who has virtually attacked the flotilla?

      • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Not to expose anything that’s best left internal, but is this something the proof of work check handles? Is it something that’s been implemented in advance? Just curious, if you can talk about it at all. I’m woefully undereducated on the actual ins and outs of the web.

        • naught@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          They can block requests from a specific origin or implement tailored rate limiting rules or disable CORS from that instance. Probably more too

          • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            The problem is that this is a client side javascript-based attack - meaning your browser sends these malicious requests. So a DDOS, not “just” a regular (centralized) DOS. Anyone opening the page with javascript turned on (which is 99% of real users, however for Lemmy the statistic’s surely a bit better) is an “attacker”.

            You can - once you know of the nature of the attack (this one’s relatively simplistic), just react to any realistic-looking request and block ignore the malicious ones - in this case garbled rng output.

            Rate limiting would only lead to what the attacker wants - legit users (who are unknowingly sending these malicious requests) being blocked from accessing the site.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          21 hours ago

          For this kind of stuff you can easily ask an llm and it will give you a pretty decent rundown of mitigation tactics

          • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Just thought it would be the cherry on top if this final outburst was automatically blocked by a mitigation measure that was already there.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’d gather that he is a massive control freak. Hard to feel sorry for him right now really but I agree it must be a sad life.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Sometimes the kind of crap done by people who are selfish wankers is just that - crap - not a cry for help.

      Certainly in my personal experience people who haven’t actually grown up as persons to become mature adults don’t actually see the problems that they repeateadly get into with everybody else because of having the emotional complexity and impulse control of toddlers as their fault, but rather as the fault of others.

      There’s no cry for help in their actions because they don’t think they need help.

      • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I dunno the dev has made loads of posts in the past year saying they’ll quit lemmy and tesseract only to come back. Clearly they were struggling and finding threadiverse wasnt helping but couldn’t stop coming back…

        Feels like crisis/cry for help behaviour to me. Especially since they spent their first couple years on fedi being opinionated but generally polite and contributing compared to… whatever the fuck happened past couple months…