• whereitsat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    devil’s advocate: "actually, if the factory owner disappeared, the factory wouldn’t be able to run because there would be nobody to replace the roof after it caved in; i held off on repairing it for 3 years to buy a vacation home but that’s not important.’

  • therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t have to imagine it. It’s literally what happened during the COVID lockdown.

    The billionaire parasites were nowhere to be seen - they even disappeared off our tv’s. They became irrelevant overnight, while everybody scould easily see for themselves who it really was that made our societies tick.

    They did not appreciate that at all.

  • ravelin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Imagine waking up tomorrow and every billionaire vanished.”

    I imagine this almost every night. It’s called a “dream.”

    It’s good to have dreams.

  • vandsjov@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 days ago

    I typically tell it with a less drastic story / time frame. Send the CEO on a month vacation vs sending all the workers on a month vacation, and then see what has the biggest impact on the company.

  • FluidBeef@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    3 days ago

    But maybe we’d also realise that the majority of work done is just callisthenic activity to enrich a tiny minority of freeloaders, and we could reorganise society around sharing expediency and creating leisure and creative time?

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    A bunch of companies would start acting really weird as multi-millionaire board members get into knife fights over corporate control.

    Some of them would become billionaires if they wrangle control.

    So billionaires are really just the symptom, the entire system is the cause. Leave the system in place and your symptoms come back almost immediately.

    • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Even if these companies somehow magically, within the realm of imagination were to split up or disappear and it’s just small to medium sized businesses who are left, capital would inevitably concentrate back again. The billionaire narrative is beyond ass istg

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I disagree that the “billionaire narrative is ass” because it does help to unite people in the moment, however you’re right that billionaires are a symptom and not the cause.

        The issue is not just the capitalist system in the west, it’s the fact that the overarching system of the world is capitalist, and capitalism operates by rewarding maximization of profit (by means of exploitation) with concentration of power.

        So while the billionaires are a symptom rather than a cause, demonizing them helps to turn working class people – a lot of whom lack the education or context to understand the systemic issues creating billionaires – against the concept of concentration of power as reward.

        At least, in my opinion, anyway.

        • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago
          1. In what way does the working class benefit from the anti-billionaire narrative, assuming that we live in an imaginary world where their goals are realized and reforms are put into place (which have no chance of happening in our world)? Who benefits from this if not nation states arming themselves for upcoming imperialist war or medium sized capitalists absorbing the company splits?

          2. This narrative isn’t even being spearheaded by “the working class”, but progressive bourgeois standing to gain for it via either opportunism or the aforementioned capital absorption/takeover. Workers aren’t some goycattle that you need to tell who the enemy is and bam, you suddenly have class consciousness, that’s how the world works only in fiction.

          • Banana@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            My answer is in my initial comment and I don’t wish to elaborate, I am not emotionally attached to this opinion enough to defend it further.

            I believe you have good reason to think that narrative is ass, I just disagree with you (for personal, idealist/optimist reasons that likely won’t change your mind), and I’m okay with that as I don’t think you believing that is causing any issues.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Bug infestations of your house sometimes reoccur as well. Doesn’t mean you shouldn’t exterminate them though. You just got to keep doing periodically. That’s part of Home Maintenance. Exterminating billionaires periodically is part of society maintenance.

        • Banana@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If infestations are the analogy we are using, I’d use mold infestation as an example.

          When you get black mold on your wall, what do you do? Do you replace the drywall and wait until it comes back to replace the drywall again, or do you figure out what is causing the mold (ie. The source of the moisture) so you can get rid of it for good?

          Like yeah sure replacing the drywall will make it look nice, but it won’t be long before it comes back with a vengeance because the cause never left.

          Expecting later generations to follow our rules is how we got here.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think its simply adorable that you think human greed can be “fixed”. But no, like some bug infestations there are times when shit goes bad and you have to deal with it periodically. There are not always magical one time solutions to everything.

              • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                You think greed is not inherent? That is a hell of an opinion. Truly difficult to Fathom how you came to it. Considering there are just mountains of evidence otherwise.

              • njm1314@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                The overall problem is human nature. Greed is part of that nature and has been so for millennium. That’s simply undeniable. Through the Ages through every human society through every human economic system it rears its ugly head every time. It’s not new. It’s not specific to the current world. Denying that is simply childish. Thinking you can fix that is simply childish.

                Some things take constant work and constant vigilance to fight. Magic solutions don’t exist. Any system you create that doesn’t account for these factors and doesn’t have consistent safeguards is destined to fail.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    True, if every billionaire vanished then literally nothing would change, workers would still be forced to participate in wage labor for their survival and be exploited!

  • krisevol@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Most workers wouldn’t be going to work. Most of them would be out of a job instantly. This is because most billionaires operate on leverage, or loans against their stocks and have low cash high weath. When they die the bill is due, and the buyers would dry up in the market causing a dealty spiral as margin calls start coming in.

    This is the difference between cash and wealth.

    • Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      At the executive top the power vacuums will cause some to go absolutely insane. Their is a lot of potential wealth to conquer here.

      The speed of information matters a lot here, a good amount of time will be needed to settle most things post-death.

      Short term for the majority of people, little will change, tomorrows contractor job is either signed or not. Management isn’t going to sink the company the instant leadership gets confused.

      Over time some melt/split/mutate/survive or end. As is the natural lifecycle of companies.

    • gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      All that doesn’t matter in the end.

      The work the workers are doing still needs doing, so everyone can eat, sleep with a roof over them, have healthcare, etc.

      Some things may change on papers, ownerships, bank accounts, lots of stuff that doesn’t really matter.

      The work still needs done, so the workers will be doing it.

        • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Right you’re going to stop eating, using water, living in a shelter, wearing clothes all because the current businesses are gone? People have ‘worked’ for millenia longer than capitalism has existed. We work in order to live.

          • krisevol@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Your right they have, but that isn’t the point of the post. The post implies everyone would just go on as normal. But this isn’t the case, it would be very different.

        • A404@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ahh yes because the only way to motivate people is with money. Nevermind the fact that moneyless ancient civilizations existed in the past