• festus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Switching to something rolling release makes sense. My Arch setup (btw) has always felt much more stable than when I was using Ubuntu, because with Ubuntu I’d inevitatebly run into a bug, find out it was fixed months ago but won’t be backported, and then either live with it or try custom-installing the newer version of that thing. Or I’d install something manually that expected dependency X be the latest version, etc.

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s exactly why I moved to Arch too…

      I don’t recall what it was, but the fixed upstream version had been around for months, so I just moved.

      I’ve even helped report / triage bugs, and they’ve been fixed and appeared in updates, which gives a good feeling

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    While I wouldn’t want my system to be Debian Testing, I’m pretty happy that more people are testing sid.

    That’ll be good for all of us.

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Don’t know about using a Debian Testing base, just because the word “testing” does not inspire confidence.

  • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Many distros are now based on Debian Testing. I feel like they could come together and maintain a shared stable base, similar to what Ubuntu used to be for them. Kinda like the Open Gaming Collective guys did for their kernel development.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    14 hours ago

    When my Tuxedo Pulse arrived, I turned it on once to marvel at the fact that it started up straight into Linux. Then restarted it to install Arch btw and never looked back. Fantastic laptop, tho.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      thinking of a new Tuxedo Lemur Pro or Framework 13Pro , still unsure. Framework seems to have the better screen?

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        Can’t comment on the Lemur Pro, but the Pulse has an excellent screen. Was wanting more pixels than a 1080p screen but 4K incurs ridiculous cost and tends to be available on “laptops that don’t fit on your lap”. 2880x1800 @ 120 Hz means your fonts look really crisp and updates are smooth.

  • endlessvoid@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Probably a good decision in the long run, their rational makes sense. Ubuntu’s stubborn insistence on snap is poor decision making on their part.

    I run Tuxedo as my daily driver and look forward to the more rolling release focused strategy.

    • auzy1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t really have an issue with snap personally. The real problem is that their store doesn’t integrate with Flatpack properly. So the whole thing just gets clunky

        • auzy1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          i can’t speak for that… Or against it (I use fedora anyway). But, I would agree that snap is letting Ubuntu down at the moment, as there is a lot of good in ubuntu too

          From a user side though, that’s because the whole ubuntu/snap store thing is just clunky, even if we ignore who controls the store. Gnome Software and discover I find are more usable than Snap store. Cosmic will likely catch up too

          And if you add snap support to the other package software, it becomes a mess

          I will give them credit for trying these things though, and feel bad for them that Mir, bazaar and snap didn’t really succeed

          • Ghoelian@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            There’s some other issues with how they handled snap as well. If you use apt to install Firefox for example, it won’t install the native .deb by default, but silently install the snap version instead. People were rightfully mad a out that.

            Also the fact that it’s proprietary and (afaik) only supports canonicals own repository, make me not feel bad for them this failed. They explicitly made it so unlikeable.

    • frogzombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Sucks it will take a fresh install, but the whole reason I switched from arch was stability with new feature parity.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Moving away from Ubuntu makes absolute sense from what they describe.

    I do wonder though, is basing a distro on Debian Testing a good idea? I understand them not wanting to go to the Debian stable as they already have issues with big drift for the cutting edge tools they want to ship breaking have the unintended consequences of breaking stable software. But Debian Testing will add in a constant shift in all the packages; they may be more recent but there is a much greater exposure to bugs.

    Tuxedo’s OS will itself become a testing ground for packages in a way it wasn’t before. They’re both moving away from Ubuntu AND moving away from a LTS base. Though I suppose they can always re-base to Debian Stable at it’s next big release if they do find it too cumbersome.

    Still, I wonder if this will happen with other distros. I know Mint has a Debian flavour which is seemingly described as a backup “plan B” in-case they felt the need to shift. I can also see the constant forcing of Snap into the ecosystem, and now the vague AI stuff that Tuxedo quote would also prompt a lot of distros to decide how dependent should they be on Ubuntu going forward.

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      This seems like slop for all the Ubuntu haters, but i agree moving to testing isn’t a good sign.

      TBH while I like the hardware of my laptop, I’ve been pretty unimpressed by the software that Tuxedo provide.

      While i appreciate not having snaps by default, the control center they ship is an electron app that requires /tmp be executable out of the box, and talks to a backend daemon that wasn’t particularly secure by default, and both live in /opt despite coming from the distro itself, so I think it’s ironic when people engage in technical sneering while throwing stones from within their glasshouses.

      Also boot security doesn’t seem to be a priority for them out of the box, this seems like what they should focus on IMO, instead of switching their base

      ✘ CET OS Support: Unknown ✘ Linux kernel lockdown: Disabled ✘ Linux kernel: Tainted ✘ UEFI secure boot: Disabled

      That it’s good enough as a distro, although I’ll probably just switch to neon if Tuxedo move to a rolling release base.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Of course, this is why I’m using MX Linux, it’s Debian based. systemd optional, no snap, no flatpak, stable.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is the first post/reply in the wild about someone who uses MX Linux. I’m searching you guys for years, even though this distribution was on the top of Distrowatch for years.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I tried MX for a while. It was alright but not the distro for me beyond that short period of time. I’m glad it exists but a bit mystified at how it ended up topping the charts.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Distrowatch just lists the most popular pages that got the most clicks on Distrowatch itself. We (and I mean random few people on internet and YouTube and elsewhere) have theories it could be a few users or a bot who wants to see the distribution on top, doing the clicks. Or its legit clicks off course. In example if a distribution have a bad documentation or website, or its not that well known and people want learn more about it with detailed information, I mean Distrowatch is not a bad place to start looking.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I saw someone else recently.

        My guess is that AI was convinced by Distrowatch fuckery that it was #1, it recommended it to people, and then it actually started getting used by real people

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Good decision. Ubuntu is a highly complex and specific all-in-one distribution never meant for customization.

  • lemmysir@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Is Mint planning the same? I know they have their debian edition, but don’t remember of it was meant to become the main edition at some point.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It won’t happen any time soon unless Ubuntu does something drastic. I do think it would be a good idea for them to move in that direction, though.

      • lemmysir@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It does make sense, though i think you’re right, and they won’t unless Ubuntu does something to force them. Ubuntu has lost so much good grace from the community. I remember the times it was basically the go to distro, and now a lot of comments are recommending not giving it a try.

    • tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I think it’s just a proof of concept in case they feel the need to switch the base. I didn’t head anything indicating that’s the case already

      • lemmysir@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Probably. It is good as a backup though, they have options this way, if they decide Ubuntu isn’t a suitable base anymore, they already have things in motion.