• auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t really have an issue with snap personally. The real problem is that their store doesn’t integrate with Flatpack properly. So the whole thing just gets clunky

      • auzy1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        i can’t speak for that… Or against it (I use fedora anyway). But, I would agree that snap is letting Ubuntu down at the moment, as there is a lot of good in ubuntu too

        From a user side though, that’s because the whole ubuntu/snap store thing is just clunky, even if we ignore who controls the store. Gnome Software and discover I find are more usable than Snap store. Cosmic will likely catch up too

        And if you add snap support to the other package software, it becomes a mess

        I will give them credit for trying these things though, and feel bad for them that Mir, bazaar and snap didn’t really succeed

        • Ghoelian@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There’s some other issues with how they handled snap as well. If you use apt to install Firefox for example, it won’t install the native .deb by default, but silently install the snap version instead. People were rightfully mad a out that.

          Also the fact that it’s proprietary and (afaik) only supports canonicals own repository, make me not feel bad for them this failed. They explicitly made it so unlikeable.