• dropdrip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    OP, was the article made by AI? It’s such a short read, yet has a table-of-contents, FAQ and too many sub-headings. I won’t comment on AI’s utility, but this is a mess of an article. That’s not a critique of AI–website articles turned into incoherent messes before the public could utilize such software. An observation is that AI cannot stop this degradation, but only accelerates it…

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I just choose not to spend my brainpower thinking about these things to be honest. I only really care if the article had content I care about not how it was written. And that said, I’ve seen far worse articles than that long before LLMs were around.