i wouldnt know where to get the info in the first place. when i use windows update i also dont reed any changelog because that shouldnt be the users job but the suppliers
The whole point of the AUR is that it’s just random people’s code. There is no supplier here. If you don’t know where to find that information, you really shouldn’t be using AUR.
that is indeed the official guides’ fault if they’re not in charge of helping maintain the AUR package. not the case for most of the infected packages here other than notably alvr, though.
As an avid user of the AUR, you’d be correct if you were downloading from the official arch repository. But you aren’t. AUR is basically like downloading from github. The only “guarantee” you get is from whoever put the package up and its up to you to determine if they’re trustworthy.
i wouldnt know where to get the info in the first place. when i use windows update i also dont reed any changelog because that shouldnt be the users job but the suppliers
windows update doesn’t force you to take a look at the changelog. most AUR helpers do so you better bet that it’s important
The whole point of the AUR is that it’s just random people’s code. There is no supplier here. If you don’t know where to find that information, you really shouldn’t be using AUR.
In an ideal world yes, but I needed some software that was only available via AUR and if the official guides tell me I can install it via AUR I will.
that is indeed the official guides’ fault if they’re not in charge of helping maintain the AUR package. not the case for most of the infected packages here other than notably alvr, though.
As an avid user of the AUR, you’d be correct if you were downloading from the official arch repository. But you aren’t. AUR is basically like downloading from github. The only “guarantee” you get is from whoever put the package up and its up to you to determine if they’re trustworthy.