I did not “straight up lie,” the information is publicly available. Needing to apply for it is not the same as being safeguarded, and the prior ones are easily downloadable as well. You continued to play the very tedious debate pervert role over and over again, without explanation. I really don’t see how you can call me pathetic while doing this.
We’ve already established that you’re willing to lie to win an argument, why do you think I’d listen to aaaanything else you’re going to bring to this?
I never lied, so no, we haven’t established that. All we’ve established is that you will go to enormous lengths to try to discuss something entirely irrelevant. It’s like I never left Reddit.
You absolutely 🎶diiiiiiiiiiiiiid🎶 and you are humiliating yourself here.
…
(Hey so I’m gonna go do something more interesting than listen to you recite the narcissist’s prayer, I’ll get back to your next limp accusation of “perverted debate behavior” or not making a point or w/e in a while mmk? mmk.)
You’re still… doing this? You lied, dude. You knowingly presented a source to support your claim as being public, when it isn’t, and even better you’d never even seen the data. That’s just lying, there’s no way to whine or insult your way out of it. You, are a liar.
It is available to the public, though. Here’s Arnaud Bertrand talking about it. I’ve seen the data. I am not a liar, you seemed to have an extremely particular definition of publicly available and derailed the conversation on those ground alone. Very strange.
I did not “straight up lie,” the information is publicly available. Needing to apply for it is not the same as being safeguarded, and the prior ones are easily downloadable as well. You continued to play the very tedious debate pervert role over and over again, without explanation. I really don’t see how you can call me pathetic while doing this.
We’ve already established that you’re willing to lie to win an argument, why do you think I’d listen to aaaanything else you’re going to bring to this?
I never lied, so no, we haven’t established that. All we’ve established is that you will go to enormous lengths to try to discuss something entirely irrelevant. It’s like I never left Reddit.
Man, go back to the “debate pervert” thing that was way less embarassing for you than honestly calling someone a redditor.
I never lied, yet you continued to play debate games to try to derail the conversation. None of this is particularly embarrassing for me.
You absolutely 🎶diiiiiiiiiiiiiid🎶 and you are humiliating yourself here.
…
(Hey so I’m gonna go do something more interesting than listen to you recite the narcissist’s prayer, I’ll get back to your next limp accusation of “perverted debate behavior” or not making a point or w/e in a while mmk? mmk.)
(Bye for now!)
Nope, didn’t lie. Keep digging deeper, I guess?
You’re still… doing this? You lied, dude. You knowingly presented a source to support your claim as being public, when it isn’t, and even better you’d never even seen the data. That’s just lying, there’s no way to whine or insult your way out of it. You, are a liar.
It is available to the public, though. Here’s Arnaud Bertrand talking about it. I’ve seen the data. I am not a liar, you seemed to have an extremely particular definition of publicly available and derailed the conversation on those ground alone. Very strange.